From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Better subjects, bodies for commit diff emails? Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:25:59 -0500 Message-ID: <874omppuhk.fsf@red-bean.com> References: <87r5ptpzuz.fsf@red-bean.com> <201001131938.o0DJchVa007241@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: Karl Fogel NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263417984 29830 80.91.229.12 (13 Jan 2010 21:26:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:26:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 13 22:26:16 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NVAjH-0003sl-IV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:26:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57526 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVAjI-0003aw-6X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:26:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVAjC-0003aa-Ay for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:26:10 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVAj8-0003Z1-QM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:26:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56970 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVAj8-0003Ys-J2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:26:06 -0500 Original-Received: from sanpietro.red-bean.com ([66.146.206.141]:60792) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NVAj8-0001lg-BV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:26:06 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40679 helo=kfogel-work ident=kfogel) by sanpietro.red-bean.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NVAj6-00017e-Iv; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:26:04 -0600 In-Reply-To: <201001131938.o0DJchVa007241@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> (Dan Nicolaescu's message of "Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:38:43 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119934 Archived-At: Dan Nicolaescu writes: >Karl Fogel writes: > > Our commit diff emails currently have subject lines like this: > > > > "[Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r99318: Fix gc bug in terminal allocation." > > > > They would be better like this, I think: > > > > "[Emacs-diffs] r99318: Fix gc bug in terminal allocation." > > > > The "/srv/bzr/emacs/trunk" is pretty much wasted space. Do we even send > >So is [Emacs-diffs] Yes -- I'd *love* to get rid of that too, but I'm so accustomed to losing that battle on other forums that I didn't even bother to suggest it here. But if we have rough consensus that the "[Emacs-diffs]" is unnecessary, let's ditch it!