From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Google modules integration Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 04:29:58 +0200 Message-ID: <874odvd789.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <878w3a1x9s.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <81occ6zdnh.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284258621 3568 80.91.229.12 (12 Sep 2010 02:30:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 02:30:21 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 12 04:30:20 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OucKg-0001jf-9v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 04:30:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36850 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OucKf-0004w2-Kn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 22:30:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39578 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OucKZ-0004uK-IA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 22:30:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OucKY-0000ff-J9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 22:30:11 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:35915) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OucKY-0000f1-BO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 22:30:10 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OucKV-0001iR-Hw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 04:30:07 +0200 Original-Received: from 83.52.52.115 ([83.52.52.115]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 04:30:07 +0200 Original-Received: from ofv by 83.52.52.115 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 04:30:07 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 10 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.52.52.115 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:E3XoAcJaO2YmAXCRjh/rp+NpYH4= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130003 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero writes: [snip] > (What I mean is, has someone really tried to defend that kind of > license on a tribunal? Did it work?) Not exactly the same issue, but this is scary: http://www.osnews.com/story/23794/US_Court_Upholds_EULAs_Criminalises_Pretty_Much_All_of_Us