From: Julien Danjou <julien@danjou.info>
To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen@xemacs.org>
Cc: "Jan Djärv" <jan.h.d@swipnet.se>,
"Andreas Schwab" <schwab@linux-m68k.org>,
"Stefan Monnier" <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>,
emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Type-error in C code
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 10:28:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874obhobw7.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8739r1eizz.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (Stephen J. Turnbull's message of "Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:05:20 +0900")
On Tue, Nov 16 2010, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Finally, note that a default *is* an option. Do you want to force
> union type for all builds, or do you want to make it the default and
> leave the option to the user to use the (possibly faster) bit-flicking
> implementation?
Since I don't buy your arguments[1], I think it should NOT be an option,
but the implementation itself.
OTOH, I only talked about using a struct including the integer, not
necessarily the whole union type used by use-union-lisp-type.
We already use that kind of type in XCB[2] without any problem.
[1] Which were probably true a long time ago, but you will need to prove
that it does not compile anywhere and is slow to me in 2010. :)
[2] http://xcb.freedesktop.org
--
Julien Danjou
// ᐰ <julien@danjou.info> http://julien.danjou.info
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-16 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-12 14:02 Type-error in C code Stefan Monnier
2010-11-12 14:21 ` Julien Danjou
2010-11-12 15:12 ` Jan Djärv
2010-11-12 15:22 ` Julien Danjou
2010-11-12 15:28 ` Julien Danjou
2010-11-12 15:32 ` Julien Danjou
2010-11-12 15:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-11-12 15:58 ` Julien Danjou
2010-11-12 16:06 ` John Yates
2010-11-12 16:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-11-12 16:47 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-11-12 19:44 ` Miles Bader
2010-11-12 15:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-11-12 17:13 ` Jan D.
2010-11-12 21:15 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2010-11-13 19:19 ` Jan Djärv
2010-11-13 19:52 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2010-11-13 22:23 ` Jan Djärv
2010-11-13 20:38 ` Johan Bockgård
2010-11-14 10:21 ` Jan Djärv
2010-11-12 18:45 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-11-12 21:00 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-11-15 21:11 ` Julien Danjou
2010-11-15 21:19 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-11-16 5:43 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-11-16 7:56 ` Julien Danjou
2010-11-16 9:05 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-11-16 9:28 ` Julien Danjou [this message]
2010-11-16 12:11 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2010-11-16 15:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-11-16 15:38 ` Julien Danjou
2010-11-16 17:05 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-11-16 9:36 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-11-13 20:00 ` Julien Danjou
2010-11-15 16:08 ` Stefan Monnier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874obhobw7.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org \
--to=julien@danjou.info \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=jan.h.d@swipnet.se \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=stephen@xemacs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).