From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [emacs-diffs-request@gnu.org: Emacs-diffs Digest, Vol 96, Issue 98] Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:49:06 -0500 Message-ID: <874oaytzod.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <834ob09ccq.fsf@gnu.org> <83zksr97gg.fsf@gnu.org> <87vd3fzi90.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1291194432 32454 80.91.229.12 (1 Dec 2010 09:07:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 09:07:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 01 10:07:08 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PNieZ-0007fC-Rs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 10:07:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40397 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PNieZ-0004wQ-6I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 04:07:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44757 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PNdwA-000700-DB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 23:05:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PNVGJ-0004No-TY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:49:13 -0500 Original-Received: from pantheon-po42.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.101]:38128) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PNVGJ-0004Kt-Rh; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:49:11 -0500 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp128036014010.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po42.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id oAUIn6f5015706 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:49:06 -0500 Original-Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5DA73160AB5; Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:49:06 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 30 Nov 2010 13:21:50 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133261 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> I have checkouts of both the trunk and emacs-23 taken minutes before >> savannah went down: revisions 102543 and 100249 respectively. (Savannah >> went down just as I was committing to the trunk, and for a minute I >> thought my commit had somehow crashed *.gnu.org). > >> So, a simple "bzr push" from the bound branches should do the trick? > > All that matters is that noone commits until the latest commit has > been pushed back onto savannah. So, I'd urge everyone to try > "update/pull" first, then "push", and then wait for a day (or two) > before committing, in case someone else already has a more recent > version of the branch. Looks like bzr.savannah.gnu.org is back up. I've pushed emacs-23 and trunk. In the case of the trunk, I'm almost completely certain that I have the latest copy, since, as I said, Savannah went down just as (or a minute after) I did my last commit.