From: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
To: "Štěpán Němec" <stepnem@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Eliminating a couple of independent face definitions
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 12:05:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874o8m1i68.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8739o6ep0w.fsf@gmail.com> ("Štěpán Němec"'s message of "Wed, 02 Feb 2011 10:58:39 +0100")
Štěpán Němec <stepnem@gmail.com> writes:
> Making two faces that were originally orange and green both orange(ish)
> doesn't sound like a terribly good idea.
Fair enough. So, let's make it font-lock-variable-name-face and
font-lock-type-face, which are orange and green by default.
> Similarly to my reaction to your similar proposal on the Gnus list -- I
> don't think you can use the current very limited set of default font
> lock faces for all the various faces out there (or "in there" in Emacs
> core). Maybe you could introduce some more default faces to begin with,
> from which the others could then more sensibly inherit?
The counterargument is that the majority of faces out there already do
inherit from font-lock and other basic faces.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-02 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-02 4:05 Eliminating a couple of independent face definitions Chong Yidong
2011-02-02 4:11 ` Lennart Borgman
2011-02-02 5:02 ` Tim Cross
2011-02-02 15:15 ` Drew Adams
2011-02-02 17:17 ` Chong Yidong
2011-02-02 20:33 ` Philipp Haselwarter
2011-02-02 23:01 ` Lennart Borgman
2011-02-03 19:10 ` Drew Adams
2011-02-04 0:12 ` Tim Cross
2011-02-05 22:11 ` Drew Adams
2011-02-07 0:59 ` Drew Adams
2011-02-07 1:30 ` Tim Cross
2011-02-07 14:09 ` Drew Adams
2011-02-07 21:14 ` Tim Cross
2011-02-07 22:12 ` Drew Adams
2011-02-08 3:51 ` Tim Cross
2011-02-08 15:26 ` Drew Adams
2011-02-08 19:10 ` Philipp Haselwarter
2011-02-08 13:58 ` Davis Herring
2011-02-08 14:33 ` Drew Adams
2011-02-08 15:34 ` Davis Herring
2011-02-08 16:16 ` Drew Adams
2011-02-08 17:40 ` Lennart Borgman
2011-02-08 19:10 ` Davis Herring
2011-02-07 1:08 ` Tim Cross
2011-02-04 0:18 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2011-02-04 3:55 ` John Yates
2011-02-04 4:56 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2011-02-04 4:57 ` Jambunathan K
2011-02-05 22:09 ` Drew Adams
2011-02-06 7:11 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2011-02-04 10:26 ` Julien Danjou
2011-02-04 17:57 ` color-complement for defface (was: Eliminating a couple of independent face definitions) Ted Zlatanov
2011-02-14 18:11 ` color-complement for defface Ted Zlatanov
2011-02-20 17:44 ` Julien Danjou
2011-03-10 19:09 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-03-10 19:11 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-02-02 21:24 ` Eliminating a couple of independent face definitions Tim Cross
2011-02-03 16:14 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2011-02-02 17:16 ` Chong Yidong
2011-02-02 9:58 ` Štěpán Němec
2011-02-02 17:05 ` Chong Yidong [this message]
2011-02-02 10:05 ` Julien Danjou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874o8m1i68.fsf@stupidchicken.com \
--to=cyd@stupidchicken.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=stepnem@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).