From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Raw strings (experimental patches inside) Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 09:23:13 +0900 Message-ID: <874no9j6vi.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <50258C47.3090004@yandex.ru> <878vdlswar.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <502690BF.8090503@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1344731011 4378 80.91.229.3 (12 Aug 2012 00:23:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 00:23:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: vrrm00@gmail.com, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 12 02:23:32 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T0Lxl-0004f6-VI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 02:23:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54090 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T0Lxl-0003iZ-3S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 20:23:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33187) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T0Lxh-0003iI-Mz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 20:23:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T0Lxf-0003C1-Nq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 20:23:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:51229) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T0Lxf-0003Bv-EI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Aug 2012 20:23:19 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60212970885; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 09:23:13 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 224EE11F88A; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 09:23:13 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <502690BF.8090503@yandex.ru> X-Mailer: VM 8.0.12-devo-585 under 21.5 (beta31) "ginger" b4715fcbe001 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.158.97.224 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:152444 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: > At which point would the string obtain this text property? If we're > discussing the case of using it in Elisp source code, this would need to > be done in the reader, no? Which brings us back to "special > syntax". Nothing "needs" to be done in the Lisp reader. Certainly it would be more convenient that way, and I recommend it.