From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r110286: Sync Org 7.9.2 from the commit tagged "release_7.9.2" in Org's Git repo. Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 19:17:17 +0200 Message-ID: <874nmc94ki.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87pq5267ew.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87sj9yt6if.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <871uhhxcap.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ehlgbybl.fsf@Rainer.invalid> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1349198256 32526 80.91.229.3 (2 Oct 2012 17:17:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 17:17:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 02 19:17:40 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TJ666-0000Hy-Pg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 19:17:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52889 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJ65z-0004q1-1p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 13:17:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54097) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJ65t-0004pw-EI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 13:17:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJ65p-0004Gw-Aw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 13:17:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:58490) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJ65p-0004Gs-4h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 13:17:13 -0400 Original-Received: by wgbgg4 with SMTP id gg4so3164823wgb.30 for ; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 10:17:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ilRVz4amUhsjLE12G5rmgZLbKfnk26RR0bdACMauE80=; b=fPmnzxmwodkLsjkn4KSDAl/qrBygDsC1OWQF2imNlYj67oj17JEadftg5RGdACgccK ObqNm5dfvbRNnl28d7TK8k3QRGgELHk4Ov1IpspyFuItnuD4ff0DJa2a1Em1kf11kObW eeTax3TyEKYFAkYwVxGuirt+/+TKlVBWBYEFGmLo95aHD2TYHyMK2+rl7oL2aExUy0gK nmCtQnPv/QkPrga5YDmiCtHdRLBHLOO32HOgsJD/nF52xWbEk/RA3jWOEn5W7n5t4hNh 48OBTaJ/srXlnjyBJa4+K0eHS5gLr0MV4UktBkrZy36wqR/MPG8imV5kcD0oVRYmeb45 o4rQ== Original-Received: by 10.180.79.103 with SMTP id i7mr23304062wix.13.1349198232250; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 10:17:12 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from bzg.localdomain (mar75-2-81-56-68-112.fbx.proxad.net. [81.56.68.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q4sm22445984wix.9.2012.10.02.10.17.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 02 Oct 2012 10:17:11 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by bzg.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9569122EDC; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 19:17:17 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87ehlgbybl.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (Achim Gratz's message of "Tue, 02 Oct 2012 19:03:58 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 74.125.82.49 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153935 Archived-At: Achim Gratz writes: > Bastien writes: >>> I've had another look. Please simply remove that definition completely >>> from the org-version.el in Emacs. The search heuristics should then >>> find the styles installed with Emacs. For standalone Org, please leave >>> the defconst — this is correct there, since the content is generated. >> >> Well, I've had a close look at what does org-odt-data-dir and I simply >> removed it. > > You've removed functionality that some systems (mine for instance) > relied on. Since there is no replacement, you effectively broke Org. > Worse, you did all that on the maint branch which has the promise that > there are exactly no non-bugfixes between releases. Can you tell me how I broke your system so that I can help fixing it? -- Bastien