From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.auctex.devel,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/elpa r312: Update AUCTeX ELPA package to the new 11.87 release. Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 15:08:19 +0100 Message-ID: <874njno1bg.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> References: <87fw3m1di7.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <871uf5sgj4.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87hao0mw44.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87ip8gd1al.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355580504 21239 80.91.229.3 (15 Dec 2012 14:08:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 14:08:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: auctex-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: auctex-devel-bounces+gead-auctex-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 15 15:08:37 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gead-auctex-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TjsPt-0004fa-LX for gead-auctex-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 15:08:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54194 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjsPg-0007YX-D2 for gead-auctex-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 09:08:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59135) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjsPe-0007YS-Qn for auctex-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 09:08:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjsPd-0002wt-Tk for auctex-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 09:08:22 -0500 Original-Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:54617) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TjsPd-0002wp-Q9; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 09:08:21 -0500 Original-Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.46]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 274EA20815; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 09:08:21 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 15 Dec 2012 09:08:21 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=smtpout; bh=K1Lt/xxsHiKn87tt0cnBPQtssqk=; b=byW9a/t/UsXfVrX6lSG02r1h1xeL YAiRkpV0tMnp8LyaoAawkFSw//ktAWPIAA4lDmqVrHgoxJ/OhjSiG4PiIUAkcbsc nE5HdSEuXsTv2qDBcdc588smAgnnr1JbDu6w+F5u+fmNdhpCSJjXQZlpib4ytUy3 VjiS1/mW+jpsiTY= X-Sasl-enc: 7Bm9/de/xdCbIMPrrMuqsjqUw6cVSANda9lC+WMN55ip 1355580500 Original-Received: from thinkpad.tsdh.de (unknown [91.67.10.84]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 580908E0693; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 09:08:20 -0500 (EST) Mail-Followup-To: David Kastrup , Stefan Monnier , auctex-devel@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87ip8gd1al.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (David Kastrup's message of "Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:24:50 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 66.111.4.28 X-BeenThere: auctex-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for AUCTeX developers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: auctex-devel-bounces+gead-auctex-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: auctex-devel-bounces+gead-auctex-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.auctex.devel:2799 gmane.emacs.devel:155580 Archived-At: David Kastrup writes: >>> The only remaining problem I can imagine is for those few files >>> which aren't FSF-copyright and hence aren't in the ELPA package, but >>> IIUC these are obsoletish and could just be dropped (noone >>> complained about them missing from the ELPA version). >> >> Yes, these 5 or 6 files are only addons for some special latex >> styles. They are not important for auctex, and they could be dropped >> or easily rewritten by someone else with CA by just looking at the >> corresponding latex style but not the current code. > > Also possible to go assignment-shopping for them once again. Did that now, and all four are going to assign copyright to the FSF. Bye, Tassilo