From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: using GnuTLS 3.x and certificate checks (was: Anyone building Emacs trunk with MinGW w64 (32 bits)) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 09:17:38 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <874nfxt219.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> References: <87zjxumbjf.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83vc8f1t0x.fsf@gnu.org> <87sj3jcr6t.fsf@wanadoo.es> <86zjxrs4jm.fsf@gmail.com> <87k3ovcn1r.fsf@wanadoo.es> <86fvzj2gkz.fsf@gmail.com> <87sj3jaqfs.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83y5dazmpt.fsf@gnu.org> <86ehf2zefk.fsf@gmail.com> <86li9az2sw.fsf@gmail.com> <83hajyz1mi.fsf@gnu.org> <867gku88lx.fsf@gmail.com> <83a9pqysc5.fsf@gnu.org> <86sj3i6ndd.fsf@gmail.com> <83620eyonh.fsf@gnu.org> <86620dqmsd.fsf@gmail.com> <83r4j1xmim.fsf@gnu.org> <86y5d9p4oh.fsf@gmail.com> <83ppylxidt.fsf@gnu.org> <86txnxoz1k.fsf@gmail.com> <83hajxxd5c.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1364390284 31191 80.91.229.3 (27 Mar 2013 13:18:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:18:04 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 27 14:18:31 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UKqFH-0004bg-2I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:18:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44015 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UKqEs-0004f8-Rd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 09:18:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35876) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UKqEp-0004ds-3m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 09:18:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UKqEk-0006Yx-8l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 09:17:59 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:46929) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UKqEk-0006Y3-1A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 09:17:54 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UKqF4-00043e-B7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:18:14 +0100 Original-Received: from pool-72-93-31-86.bstnma.east.verizon.net ([72.93.31.86]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:18:14 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by pool-72-93-31-86.bstnma.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:18:14 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 21 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-72-93-31-86.bstnma.east.verizon.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:5ksRbJW8bK9FVPCS6ENiSCEKfAE= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158299 Archived-At: On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:03:59 +0200 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> gnutls.c:117:1: warning: 'gnutls_connection_end_t' is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations] EZ> Ted, could you please look into this? This function was deprecated in GnuTLS 2.99. 3.1.10 is the latest. I used 2.x when I did the GnuTLS support, but by now 3.x is much more widely distributed so I think we can switch to it. Fortunately, the changes will be minimal because the API hasn't changed significantly AFAIK. So this is mostly a policy decision. At least in Ubuntu 12.10, GnuTLS 3.x is the default. I know it's already what people use on W32 and MacOS X. What about other platforms? Any concerns? This would also be a good time to enable SSL certificate verification by default. We said we'd wait until 24.3 is out to make that change. Ted