From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: trunk r116456: Improve dbus performance on synchronous calls Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:08:02 +0100 Message-ID: <874n3xmor1.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87lhx9lo4y.fsf@gmx.de> <53023627.1060001@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392671296 31723 80.91.229.3 (17 Feb 2014 21:08:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 21:08:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: dancol@dancol.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 17 22:08:23 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WFVQN-0002be-Ba for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:08:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44136 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFVQM-0008UL-O7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:08:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35711) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFVQE-0008UB-4A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:08:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFVQ7-00071m-QK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:08:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:58056) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFVQ7-00071G-Gy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:08:07 -0500 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([93.209.82.193]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPS (Nemesis) id 0MgbTj-1WcFMZ1diR-00O0LD for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:08:05 +0100 In-Reply-To: (dancol@dancol.org's message of "Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:41:51 -0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:cOB7qoFmUddhQMclIIOrFsGiBDr0+7+DOe/s35/zTyNXTvBDFWz LK+x3Hh0K6WOrrFPZk7dzFA27pMQ9JDPoK2RlyigrcYtyBbMERJoRp9R3DaFDRDpHcSZVxn glz1o+LSXFb3BoWleZ7AOYJzBQ1RMUul522liGiRpIifsUD5XwuUHvul56TC6irB57i01NT 9w36eEi68WhQ6I5SaitxQ== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.19 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:169715 Archived-At: dancol@dancol.org writes: >>> Why `push'? It adds the event on top of `unread-command-events', >>> changing the event order when there are already events in that list. >> >> Hrm. I was getting it from sit-for: > > Nope. You're right: fixed. Thanks for pointing that out. Maybe `sit-for' is wrong then as well? I haven't checked ever (and situations, where `unread-command-events' contains more than one event seem to be rare).