From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Filter list-buffers by a regexp (interactively) Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2014 09:15:51 +0200 Message-ID: <874mxmrv4o.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87oaw9fkyv.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87fvh8lrii.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <878umyjxto.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1407569073 21886 80.91.229.3 (9 Aug 2014 07:24:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2014 07:24:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 09 09:24:26 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XG10r-0001TB-JD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 09:24:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54396 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XG10r-0000ce-08 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 03:24:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49364) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XG10i-0000cR-NG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 03:24:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XG10c-0003iP-Cz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 03:24:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-we0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::235]:48280) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XG10c-0003i1-6c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 03:24:10 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id k48so6380364wev.26 for ; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 00:24:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=2zM5YPABR9arbtA3U8hA4hKmIaekx/SZ5aqlCdfYQUU=; b=058YrTkEco+dnPqqwRyCXjzwiOQDJTv/nlU8ExkvKs4Pd6nzmj80gVpN2ba1HIepEQ t0GqR0/Gb6w+c9/UAuyS1FusghLxvJ3eMDeazqHLlDVMPpcNGetxw8AWgSF9v4awbLOi rHECul6HBg2/eKpX4ZeHExX9oYCKAoK9o6Okjl8oMt01pcIGLycNTAW0eqdFSyzE0XUJ pZ/E/QstBCUXTQlpzKQL7hdZKmdp3lfBcuE52AHYJ9GzfXPwNNKbzguA4ADtR9E1NPu/ iflrcbhqrZqEQgsC9/6ySfUEjA52F8nYhRT88vmxvCbufzE3JXZYpx1aGxYLM9GOOOH8 V/Xw== X-Received: by 10.194.109.71 with SMTP id hq7mr944709wjb.114.1407569049027; Sat, 09 Aug 2014 00:24:09 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from bzg.localdomain (afdas.rain.fr. [81.80.45.173]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ch5sm22724660wjb.18.2014.08.09.00.24.06 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 09 Aug 2014 00:24:07 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by bzg.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B155C1C20458; Sat, 9 Aug 2014 09:15:51 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <878umyjxto.fsf@mail.jurta.org> (Juri Linkov's message of "Sat, 09 Aug 2014 02:41:51 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.92 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c03::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:173505 Archived-At: Juri Linkov writes: >> Since C-x C-b is fast to execute, and typing the regexp is already several keystrokes, >> what about providing a filter command within the buffer list? Yes, that's already what '*' does in the original patch. > Like in Ibuffer: '% n' - Mark buffers by their name, using a regexp. Yes, why not too. What about C-u C-x C-b prompting the user if she wants to filter by [f]iles only or by a [r]egexp? -- Bastien