From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: David Engster Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Disable emacs-diffs mails for scratch branches Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 10:59:16 +0100 Message-ID: <874m0inq4r.fsf@engster.org> References: <87sho3zewk.fsf@engster.org> <87inoy61gz.fsf@mouse> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1485684024 7020 195.159.176.226 (29 Jan 2017 10:00:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 10:00:24 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 29 11:00:18 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cXmHI-0000V9-95 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:00:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54683 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cXmHN-0000Ep-Kc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 05:00:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54171) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cXmGo-0000Ej-Dp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 04:59:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cXmGj-0000DM-IL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 04:59:38 -0500 Original-Received: from randomsample.de ([5.45.97.173]:45087) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cXmGj-0000Bx-8a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 04:59:33 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=randomsample.de; s=a; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=bpfVVnp8NuJhOy42DGYyhflMEgVDrLnSkCtgc3KpOkQ=; b=iu/EQevZFCyYan5e/H40Nc69FJVnxJxQRa1VOsMdpuTncfI94ULzfqz32F8b8wQE+Yn+JXpB49AtG7U93ZpPdivGXHsh8X8cxLUVf52Vey5q0Pl5td2wlhHMmY2sp7ha; Original-Received: from ip4d16b353.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([77.22.179.83] helo=isaac) by randomsample.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1cXmGa-0007RD-AC; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 10:59:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87inoy61gz.fsf@mouse> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 29 Jan 2017 03:31:40 +0100") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 5.45.97.173 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:211720 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > David Engster writes: > >> Subject says it all. Could we please do that? > > Can't you just kill-file the messages you're not interested in? I mean > score down. That's what I do with the scratch/ branches... Yeah sure, I do that as well. It's just that I'm kinda old-school and think that force-pushing an amended commit shouldn't trigger 300 mails... But since this doesn't seem to be easily changed, I guess we just live with it. -David