From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alex Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Native line numbers, final testing Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2017 14:51:41 -0600 Message-ID: <874lumps82.fsf@lylat> References: <83y3s9pm2a.fsf@gnu.org> <87vandz7lw.fsf@lylat> <83wp7tpcav.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2y1z45o.fsf@lylat> <83vandp7wz.fsf@gnu.org> <87mv8pyy7f.fsf@lylat> <83shigpoxq.fsf@gnu.org> <87mv8nkh31.fsf@lylat> <83bmp3pnmb.fsf@gnu.org> <87eftzju5g.fsf@lylat> <837ezqq3gd.fsf@gnu.org> <874luuyuqy.fsf@lylat> <83wp7po86m.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuecc7vg.fsf@lylat> <83y3s2n5pa.fsf@gnu.org> <878tk1rmjx.fsf@lylat> <83a84gn4z9.fsf@gnu.org> <837ezkmwfg.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1499547249 2261 195.159.176.226 (8 Jul 2017 20:54:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2017 20:54:09 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 08 22:54:04 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dTwjo-0000FM-UL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2017 22:54:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34030 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dTwju-0007ea-G1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2017 16:54:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60328) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dTwjE-0007ds-55 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2017 16:53:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dTwjB-00030I-3Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Jul 2017 16:53:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f68.google.com ([209.85.214.68]:33362) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dTwjA-0002s2-TG; Sat, 08 Jul 2017 16:53:21 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f68.google.com with SMTP id 188so8614465itx.0; Sat, 08 Jul 2017 13:52:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=LejoMm5N6sAIeUUQm5MJUyni66y/Yp9154JhRJ1E40g=; b=Dq09QtiFc6F0+cHnVU/QJvR4BNQvdKtapDK2dCpLWtg6CEnbCIVNUtTPk81pQAgJxj NtYoHLGcTuWj9t+QEG/BFQIcraqq3U6qvmns09/uuMcHeGdxeFqrSBvE6qFFAKPIfbRX EYqMQPmc3PkkrMB+vNKHw+bLoVZ5B7Vg0vKCHNdJ8sFVcWNjD7ozHSZ0m9x6MaIcRMS8 bfDDfaESlNoXRraxXYfxNFxXRY3v89JJ2RG811TLi3TtroPE+qmyYj17D+L4b3z24oVD Zi7wdNsNsdqLvvVXZFzbdqav6tiGhW2tfqJYIz+9gg+ki48rdXssH8d3b29Fb9EgzgAW gKqQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=LejoMm5N6sAIeUUQm5MJUyni66y/Yp9154JhRJ1E40g=; b=rGFv3YmqrSCQgehtJsxdRcwBRW21pD3atF+dPhtga5EmVwFgOT0nm3lqXsD69S+ATM Odb16bJSG07Snjr33J8YG4Zgm/+I20eGy3jvqHQiHklv26QbGnU1bD8pw2PjcMYQc39R LPWZ2tqy0FNkbg33NBO6/LtcInblQBRB/ccUB7liLF0+P//1qywIuk+umkZywXWzijUV G4U8Wum4DGYciu+/BMbGD2gTwOq+q08L0McYzxdx8eyOeq7fjmTWOtMc4/GRZ2G624XX z2AHZ+tpShMv+xBSZui2ZPUlrfJV56TJdmpcPrqyLVtB4C8haKZbQfsIbm/Y0YeJXzhF C61Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113mBidwz7dIr1pdnmsnxCMZ+UGhNDuWxgDi1UFi5pcfL5vvX4Yo LSxegbGLBvfn/Mu5 X-Received: by 10.36.88.135 with SMTP id f129mr5031382itb.22.1499547116724; Sat, 08 Jul 2017 13:51:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from lylat (S010664777d9cebe3.ss.shawcable.net. [70.64.85.59]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v96sm3662255ioi.50.2017.07.08.13.51.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 08 Jul 2017 13:51:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <837ezkmwfg.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 07 Jul 2017 12:24:35 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.85.214.68 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:216340 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 09:19:54 +0300 >> From: Eli Zaretskii >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> > If one has to choose between these two behaviours, then I believe the >> > former is significantly more user-friendly. It is much easier to reason >> > about, and it does not change the horizontal cursor position relative to >> > buffer contents. >> >> OK. > > Since everyone who offered opinions about this agreed with you, I have > now made a change for C-n/C-p to behave like you expected. > > Thanks. Thanks for implementing this; it works great!