From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: jakanakaevangeli Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Stop frames stealing eachothers' minibuffers! Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2021 17:44:17 +0100 Message-ID: <874kinakv2.fsf@miha-pc> References: <87wnvkixrv.fsf@miha-pc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30878"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 07 17:43:48 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l8nA2-0007vn-Tk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 17:43:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59756 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8nA1-0005ix-PZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 11:43:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37328) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8n6w-0004xl-3w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 11:40:35 -0500 Original-Received: from chiru.no ([142.4.209.132]:38652) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l8n6q-0001Ss-M4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 11:40:33 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (BSN-77-156-43.static.siol.net [193.77.156.43]) by chiru.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB1EF128001C; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 16:40:26 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: none client-ip=142.4.209.132; envelope-from=jakanakaevangeli@chiru.no; helo=chiru.no X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264124 Archived-At: > Just as a matter of interest, your email host rejected my post > yesterday, saying that the interchange had to start with a STARTTLS > command. Thank you for reporting, I will try to get in touch with my email host. > Could I ask you please to try out the following patch, which should be > applied on top of yesterday's patch: I tried it and everything works as expected, if we use C-g. The only minor thing I noticed is with abort-recursive-edit (C-]). When executed from a normal buffer, it does what its doc-string suggests. But when executed from a non-innermost minibuffer, it exits multiple recursive edits, just like abort-minibuffers. (This isn't surprising since it calls Fthrow (Qexit, Qt) just like abort-minibuffers, only without asking yes_or_no_p first.) This might actually be intended behaviour, depending on how you interpret "this minibuffer input" from abort-recursive-edit's doc-string.