From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 12409c9: New transient mode 'repeat-mode' to allow shorter key sequences (bug#46515) Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 21:44:01 +0200 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <874ki1i73y.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <20210217180506.28704.14280@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210217180507.C061220DFB@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87lfbln1w8.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87h7m9co2d.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87a6rtl7b3.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26431"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 24 20:51:25 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lF0Bx-0006lL-35 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 20:51:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44578 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lF0Bw-0007AW-4T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 14:51:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59076) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lF0Ar-0006RZ-7c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 14:50:18 -0500 Original-Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:42321) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lF0Al-0000GC-Cj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 14:50:16 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 91.129.96.116 Original-Received: from mail.gandi.net (m91-129-96-116.cust.tele2.ee [91.129.96.116]) (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2F8F46000B; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:50:06 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 24 Feb 2021 13:58:00 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.195; envelope-from=juri@linkov.net; helo=relay3-d.mail.gandi.net X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:265590 Archived-At: >>> I don't see the problem: since your code installs the keymap, it can >>> also arrange to stash the info of which keymap to look up. >> >> In >> >> (put 'next-error 'repeat-map 'next-error-repeat-map) >> (put 'previous-error 'repeat-map 'next-error-repeat-map) >> >> both next-error and previous-error are entry points to >> a repeatable key sequence, i.e. both can start a key sequence: >> >> M-g n n p ... >> M-g p p n ... > > I don't understand why you think what I said is related to what you say. > Some code somewhere installs a transient keymap. *That* code can do > some extra work to stash that keymap somewhere else as well so you can > look it up from there instead of having to check the `repeat-map` property. The key word is "somewhere". The first somewhere that installs a transient keymap in post-command-hook needs to get that keymap. Currently it gets it from the symbol property of this-command. The second somewhere is the place where it's already stashed by set-transient-map in overriding-terminal-local-map. That keymap could be checked, but there is no need since it would be easier just to use the KEEP-PRED arg.