From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gitlab Migration Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 17:20:09 +0200 Message-ID: <874kb9k34m.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87h7fcnmq0.fsf@posteo.net> <83tujbqg4j.fsf@gnu.org> <874kbbosht.fsf@gnus.org> <8335qur9h7.fsf@gnu.org> <831r6er6rz.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmty1u7a.fsf@posteo.net> <83r1eengmv.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22687"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Philip Kaludercic , danflscr@gmail.com, theo@thornhill.no, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, sir@cmpwn.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 28 17:21:44 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mK09Q-0005ft-DT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 17:21:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53878 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mK09P-0005RJ-5J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 11:21:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37410) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mK08B-00046H-AR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 11:20:27 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2]:33480) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mK088-00007J-Vk; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 11:20:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=nWrUDS7yeNOZ2l5xYIvw/RtxV9TZJJmN6nrP+viw2tc=; b=MTt9+w1eUH+OaaF+vW5O6KWvNd ESidqbZ4XecRIV7VlNMcdITAAHaGGKoEEjlQeyxPgCQRmHsUvOg8xkF6pR/vOea9BY8pKCNez/+c2 Kpc98/V//WnrkZWpwBZnP1B+UIsdq6SqBZNV6gFZY61uI4rDtt5jtYab29ldgIn3u9gU=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mK07t-0004pD-TS; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 17:20:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83r1eengmv.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 28 Aug 2021 11:00:08 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2; envelope-from=larsi@gnus.org; helo=quimby.gnus.org X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:273324 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> It shouldn't mean anything, if GNU decides to host their own >> instance. Otherwise, every project member would have to play to have an >> account, but I assume mailing list contributors could continue accessing >> the mailing list without any issue. > > This answers the first part, but not the second. It looks like the > Web-based workflows are still not supported well enough. That's also my impression. That is, SourceHut supports our current work flow very well, but it doesn't really give us the popular Github/Lab work flow: fork the repo, work on something, push it, and then do a "pull request" towards the original repo by clicking a button, without sending any emails to any person? Because that's really what we want to add as an option. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no