unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>,
	Andrea Corallo <akrl@sdf.org>
Subject: Re: ./configure --enable-check-lisp-object-type
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 20:27:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874k2ycg2p.fsf@gnus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83o81642pq.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 12 Apr 2022 20:43:29 +0300")

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> That zero corresponds to the 'Lisp_Object command_modes' member of
> Aligned_Lisp_Subr, and in a build with --enable-check-lisp-object-type
> a Lisp_Object is a struct, so it must be initialized with {0}, not
> just a scalar zero.

I can confirm that adding braces around the zero makes these warnings go
away.

There's similar warnings in alloc:

alloc.c: In function 'syms_of_alloc':
alloc.c:7838:6: warning: missing braces around initializer [-Wmissing-braces]
 7838 |      {{{ PSEUDOVECTOR_FLAG | (PVEC_SUBR << PSEUDOVECTOR_AREA_BITS) },
      |      ^
 7839 |        { .a4 = watch_gc_cons_threshold },
 7840 |        4, 4, "watch_gc_cons_threshold", {0}, 0}};
      |                                              {}

And adding braces around the zero does the trick there, too.

There's still a number of other warnings which may or may not be valid
(I haven't actually looked at them):

In file included from dbusbind.c:26:
dbusbind.c: In function 'xd_signature':
lisp.h:409:38: warning: potential null pointer dereference [-Wnull-dereference]
  409 | #define lisp_h_XCAR(c) XCONS (c)->u.s.car
      |                        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
lisp.h:1498:10: note: in expansion of macro 'lisp_h_XCAR'
 1498 |   return lisp_h_XCAR (c);
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~
lisp.h:409:38: warning: potential null pointer dereference [-Wnull-dereference]
  409 | #define lisp_h_XCAR(c) XCONS (c)->u.s.car
      |                        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~

And a some other warnings, too -- about half a dozen, I'd say.

Is the --enable-check-lisp-object-type build supposed to be without
warnings, or has that never been the ambition?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no



  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-12 18:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-12 16:58 ./configure --enable-check-lisp-object-type Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-04-12 17:23 ` Stefan Monnier
2022-04-12 17:43   ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-04-12 18:27     ` Lars Ingebrigtsen [this message]
2022-04-12 18:34       ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-04-12 18:40         ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-04-12 19:05           ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-04-12 22:20             ` Stefan Monnier
2022-04-13  8:47         ` martin rudalics

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874k2ycg2p.fsf@gnus.org \
    --to=larsi@gnus.org \
    --cc=akrl@sdf.org \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).