From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: use-package has been merged into emacs-29 Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2022 17:06:02 +0000 Message-ID: <874ju4cxs5.fsf@posteo.net> References: <878rjgd0ej.fsf@posteo.net> <83fsdozh1y.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13107"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, johnw@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 09 18:08:04 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p3gqx-0003BY-HQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 18:08:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p3gpG-0003IE-CJ; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 12:06:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p3gp9-0003HX-Ai for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 12:06:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p3gp0-0001uA-M9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 12:06:11 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CD07240106 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 18:06:00 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1670605560; bh=glnSGw0v0bfPX9AUZL9wIx62PEMQGu7OtRikQQraH3M=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=GsEPSjMThzIcVxQPM9I6/Qiu4+wozgyQ1BMfBhlxext4Gp0Cax0+pY7jds+iPTfxl /p0M2xT2PcCoVZGZxmknmf1feb+nGbR3dx/gJa/rjkUnzXadchWSwFDZFEzlK4eM+4 MB7TPxEseDZKok9lIcosk4ekFlwcJBImVroGpp87blwi1yRm+vh0JTGYN2ckFcqQ60 n3nNIWh+7OVJ5Je7pu7jUsEfsWqatT+ICO+LILVz4XYKfQ5SxpWjjzWbh/fWqb9XIJ sDRoAjAYJ4TiXuUENGmDgbBBkjRe/gU/TqZ2xD+zGemQeb4s9cKnWvyoj1Rcn9xKV7 FaKx8dtIRZBtA== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4NTHTz5pQnz6tmv; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 18:05:59 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <83fsdozh1y.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 09 Dec 2022 18:18:49 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:301081 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Philip Kaludercic >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, John Wiegley >> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2022 16:09:24 +0000 >> >> - There is still an instance of "see @ref" under the node "Global >> keybindings". > > What is the problem with "see @ref"? If you are asking, I am assuming I am wrong. My assumption was that @pxref was preferable. Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Philip Kaludercic >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, John Wiegley >> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2022 16:09:24 +0000 >> >> A few comments on use-package.texi from briefly skimming the file: > > Thanks, but there's no need to post such comments: just go ahead and > fix what needs to be fixed. People who work on these changes are not > angels: we make mistakes, and appreciate when others silently fix them > when they spot them. I am sorry if my comments had a negative tone -- I am certainly no texinfo expert, so I'd rather discuss the questions before applying any changes. Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Philip Kaludercic >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, John Wiegley >> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2022 16:09:24 +0000 >> >> - Some packages are formatted as @file's (hydra, ivy, diminish, delight, >> ...). Does this really make sense? > > A package is usually a file, so @file is correct. But sometimes the > context is talking about a feature, and then @code or @samp is better. I have also noticed there are a few instances of @file{<...>.el} vs @file{<...>}. Perhaps it makes sense to use @file when referring to the packages as file names, and @code/@samp when referring to the package name (if at all -- just like with my question whether use-package should be formatted or not).