From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Adding the `prescient` packages to NonGNU ELPA? Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2022 15:27:20 +0000 Message-ID: <874ju47g2v.fsf@posteo.net> References: <16193c73-ab80-04c9-558f-d5e6142f38f3@protonmail.com> <871qpydllo.fsf@posteo.net> <4a52210d-3e39-ed34-a7c9-c3ee6e2a7a68@protonmail.com> <11680a2c-b082-cfce-e075-9694ed06dae0@protonmail.com> <6cda848d-07da-9d8c-fd40-75727915ba3c@protonmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18362"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Okamsn , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 09 16:28:00 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p3fI7-0004UV-RE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 16:27:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p3fHb-0005C6-Uk; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 10:27:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p3fHZ-00057a-GL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 10:27:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p3fHW-0003BZ-QU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 10:27:24 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0D54240103 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 16:27:18 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1670599638; bh=7BAxQM5aO3sTNOk896rVxXURKtHyE34zLRSfLSdD6aA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=aeUb4ap8YA4FLPcKg7nurm8YSDomBZuUj2ku3hLXQQbTDwPgFJoOFEEfBSGFFuJ2v uu/bF+wC2I08r0yE9yQ/7c89LZcXbWCfpm4HBEUf0AJ83JhlN6ik4qWO7hAD+KTtFv k/J5j1/YWZsAi5Ye8ddNaYBf6ikYlFv4mkexQFk5w3tfKY0U1Wt9t0T7M4j/8qcaOs 8dK4eFD6zhMOlL9fzz2wEZRbQDgWugBcBUddzXXmTxcHG+Rv0gLrMiaErAHdaD8hFK vV3RSLwAjeCJyBzgObR6uNQocI9nzSGFYNkO3OKz1j5WSFot/M79deVp9n3i7ZP1yd ZqbDbsT9MgXQQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4NTFJ616TTz6tm6; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 16:27:18 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 09 Dec 2022 10:08:25 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:301074 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> to the ELPA spec or a provided spec. I see that the user option >> `package-vc-selected-packages` does not mention the `:ignored-files` >> entry that the ELPA spec uses, so I was wondering. > > Indeed, it does not support things like `:ignored-files` or > `.elpaignore` or `:renames`. One caveat: Along with package-vc.el, package.el coincidentally learned how to use ".elpaignore" files, but these are only used to suppress byte-compilation. elpa-admin.el uses .elpaignore and :ignored-files to exclude files from the final tarball, but this concept isn't applicable to source packages.