From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Guerry Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.orgmode Subject: Re: bug#66291: [Leo Vivier] [PATCH] orgalist: Update bug:31361 workaround for new upstream signature Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:00:35 +0100 Message-ID: <874jdyt118.fsf@bzg.fr> References: <877cvqmbxh.fsf@hidden> <87edh345dw.fsf@localhost> <87r0ink9ab.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87o7dqhhgg.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9429"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Nicolas Goaziou , Stefan Kangas , Leo Vivier , emacs-devel@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org To: Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 24 15:03:18 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rdscX-0002Do-OV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:03:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rdsbk-00072U-Aq; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 09:02:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rdsbI-0006ed-Bk; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 09:02:02 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rdsbE-0003ZW-Eb; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 09:01:58 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=Rl1KRMaM51J/LXB7dXinblfLR5q+0S7QI86GMv2Mdkk=; b=VNmQ+KQ9ZI8ryPC92Iko tCebN6lp6Y7Zaz/tllq6mFkVsNB84ewK3lnOY//d97IP0uU/vAp4cTUgYLTG7n7qGxzOCVAdRpaAE /7y1NFC1BPBXrkDRRFOWcQYonFxrO1wMuq2IQtkUnNphM/jSBWnVCdaQRgC/t7yr7nSzxXa1umReE ozVC1rhC8HgKFafaQqSkpFGWcdc5hUUOSoHbBwkGRZP3t/bjQvQebRZq+1LPFJcLKqObtpM1Mn73D qMthKysrVA1TT0+wYJk1+tTTy9kZMXnFBL6WPEGHXCuALT9rspcL3q/wRIaNsNM+QJ8yKF2s8C60K MCenVilmf83pNA==; In-Reply-To: <87o7dqhhgg.fsf@localhost> (Ihor Radchenko's message of "Fri, 12 Jan 2024 12:19:43 +0000") X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:316493 gmane.emacs.orgmode:159984 Archived-At: Ihor Radchenko writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> To answer Ihor's question : I'm out of touch concerning Org development, >> so maintaining a package such as Orgalist may be problematic at some >> point, indeed. > > Then, may we need to ask someone to help maintaining orgalist? > Similar question about a number of Org mode libraries where you are > listed as a maintainer. Yes, we definitely need to do this! -- Bastien Guerry