From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nic Ferrier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: org-mode: compatibility with viper, cua, and Emacs in general Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:19:36 +0000 Message-ID: <873bume96v.fsf@tapsellferrier.co.uk> References: <87k6ny5uqf.fsf@emptydomain.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1111588216 5624 80.91.229.2 (23 Mar 2005 14:30:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:30:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 23 15:30:15 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DE6qQ-00038D-UE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:28:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DE77w-00085e-7T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:46:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DE76r-0007Ws-6L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:45:25 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DE76a-0007Jg-OU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:45:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DE76Z-0007HZ-MH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:45:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.168.156.78] (helo=owls-tree.tapsellferrier.co.uk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.34) id 1DE6ni-0000Bq-3S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:25:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [217.207.145.34] (helo=kanga) by owls-tree.tapsellferrier.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.30 #1 (Debian)) id 1DE6ia-0006y1-MO; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:20:20 +0000 Original-Received: from nferrier by kanga with local (Exim 4.44) id 1DE6hz-0003XU-5V; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:19:43 +0000 Original-To: kai@emptydomain.de (Kai =?iso-8859-15?Q?Gro=DFjohann?=) In-Reply-To: <87k6ny5uqf.fsf@emptydomain.de> (kai@emptydomain.de's message of "Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:59:04 +0100") X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35046 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35046 kai@emptydomain.de (Kai =?iso-8859-15?Q?Gro=DFjohann?=) writes: > org-mode binds C- to move the current line down, but Emacs > generally binds this to forward-paragraph. IMVHO the two behaviors > are too different to match well: the general binding is a movement > command, the org mode binding changes the text. I found this very annoying as well. I found that M-up/down were actually more useful commands and just ditched C-up/down Nic