From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Brockman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Switching from (ido-mode 'both) to (ido-mode 'buffer) doesn't work Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:19:43 +0200 Message-ID: <873brlt180.fsf@wigwam.deepwood.net> References: <87acmtjicw.fsf@wigwam.deepwood.net> <87ll5dtsm2.fsf@wigwam.deepwood.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1118762975 22844 80.91.229.2 (14 Jun 2005 15:29:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 15:29:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 14 17:29:24 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DiDLP-0004CP-7A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:28:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DiDQQ-00063G-KP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DiDOl-0005Yt-Ot for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:32:19 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DiDOi-0005XU-Gw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:32:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DiDOh-0005Tw-JH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:32:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.54.107.70] (helo=mxfep01.bredband.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DiD9D-00080J-U3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 11:16:16 -0400 Original-Received: from wigwam ([213.112.182.79] [213.112.182.79]) by mxfep01.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20050614151454.RFBU19329.mxfep01.bredband.com@wigwam>; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:14:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=wigwam) by wigwam with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DiDCa-00023c-Kr; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:19:44 +0200 Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) X-Face: :&2UWGm>e24)ip~'K@iOsA&JT3JX*v@1-#L)=dUb825\Fwg#`^N!Y*g-TqdS AevzjFJe96f@V'ya8${57/T'"mTd`1o{TGYhHnVucLq!D$r2O{IN)7>.0op_Y`%r;/Q +(]`3F-t10N7NF\.Mm0q}p1:%iqTi:5]1E]rDF)R$9.!,Eu'9K':y9^U3F8UCS1M+A$ 8[[[WT^`$P[vu>P+8]aQMh9giu&fPCqLW2FSsGs In-Reply-To: (Kim F. Storm's message of "Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:09:29 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:38819 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:38819 storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: > I think the following patch is better -- can you pls. test it? Okay, that works great too. -- Daniel Brockman