From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: view mode: `q' does not delete frame Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 16:35:43 -0500 Message-ID: <873bl9hnkm.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1133645860 7535 80.91.229.2 (3 Dec 2005 21:37:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 21:37:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 03 22:37:37 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eif34-0005Hy-7C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 22:36:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eif36-0003be-2M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 16:36:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Eif2t-0003bL-4R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 16:35:51 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Eif2r-0003b6-Gk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 16:35:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eif2r-0003b3-Cr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 16:35:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.97] (helo=tomts40-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Eif34-0001vM-Bs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2005 16:36:02 -0500 Original-Received: from alfajor ([67.71.25.91]) by tomts40-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20051203213543.KYHF1799.tomts40-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Sat, 3 Dec 2005 16:35:43 -0500 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C4D3CD75F1; Sat, 3 Dec 2005 16:35:43 -0500 (EST) Original-To: "Drew Adams" In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Sat, 3 Dec 2005 07:37:31 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Originating-IP: [0] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:46944 Archived-At: > If frame invisibility were not bugged, I think that would be a good general > solution (i.e. good candidate for the default value). Could be a good default indeed. Although having it be an option would be even better because I much prefer iconification. > But it is bugged. Could you resend your bug-reports? Stefan