From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: src/unexhp9k800.c
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:59:38 -0500
Message-ID: <873b627ryt.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
References: <E1H8sI4-0002XI-12@fencepost.gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1169496058 17786 80.91.229.12 (22 Jan 2007 20:00:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 20:00:58 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 22 21:00:56 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1H95LR-0003BM-0Z
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:00:45 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H95LQ-0005IG-NC
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:00:44 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H95KH-0004W9-BE
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:59:33 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1H95KF-0004Tg-Ph
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:59:32 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H95KF-0004TY-In
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:59:31 -0500
Original-Received: from [18.19.1.138] (helo=cyd.mit.edu)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1H95KD-0008D3-SE; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:59:29 -0500
Original-Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 19D8F4E4FF; Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:59:38 -0500 (EST)
Original-To: rms@gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <E1H8sI4-0002XI-12@fencepost.gnu.org> (Richard Stallman's message
	of "Mon\, 22 Jan 2007 01\:04\:24 -0500")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.92 (gnu/linux)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65386
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/65386>

Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:

> Would someone please delete that file, then ack?
> Please make corresponding changes in etc/PROBLEMS and in configure.in.

It would be useful if you explained why you want the file deleted, and
what to put in etc/PROBLEMS.  What about src/m/hp800.h and
src/m/sr2k.h, which reference unexhp9k800.c for unexec on those
machines?  (Removing unexhp9k800.c will probably break Emacs on these
two machines, so maybe we should just eliminate these two files too).