From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Slow merge of vc.el begins: "focus version" Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 12:03:45 +0200 Message-ID: <873awolfum.fsf@ambire.localdomain> References: <20071006083252.F366738032@snark> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1191665095 28118 80.91.229.12 (6 Oct 2007 10:04:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 10:04:55 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 06 12:04:53 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ie6Wg-0001sD-3G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2007 12:04:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ie6Wb-0008AK-5T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2007 06:04:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ie6WY-0008AC-Dz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2007 06:04:42 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ie6WX-0008A0-1P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2007 06:04:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ie6WW-00089t-H4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2007 06:04:40 -0400 Original-Received: from ppp-56-36.21-151.libero.it ([151.21.36.56] helo=ambire.localdomain) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ie6WV-0000MJ-RC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2007 06:04:40 -0400 Original-Received: from ttn by ambire.localdomain with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ie6Vd-0003sW-0z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2007 12:03:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20071006083252.F366738032@snark> (Eric S. Raymond's message of "Sat\, 6 Oct 2007 04\:32\:52 -0400 \(EDT\)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Detected-Kernel: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:80325 Archived-At: () "Eric S. Raymond" () Sat, 6 Oct 2007 04:32:52 -0400 (EDT) I suppose "working-copy version" might be more explicit while avoiding the problem. I might switch both my code and the Emacs head revision to use that. I'll have to try altering the manual both ways and seeing how it reads. how about "tree name"? everyone understands "tree" to be directory tree, i think. i prefer "name" over "version" because it's more general. thi