From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Taylor Venable Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: choice for the new emacs icon Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 12:54:18 -0500 Organization: Church of Emacs Message-ID: <873as6as39.fsf@zeltennia.metasyntax.net> References: <200802050135.m151ZGDH005052@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202320490 28402 80.91.229.12 (6 Feb 2008 17:54:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:54:50 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 06 18:55:11 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JMoUC-0007dK-Es for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:55:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JMoTk-0001q4-2e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 12:54:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JMoTX-0001ig-N4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 12:54:23 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JMoTW-0001ha-2E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 12:54:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JMoTV-0001hU-Qf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 12:54:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.perfora.net ([74.208.4.194]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JMoTV-0004iR-Jz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 12:54:21 -0500 Original-Received: from zeltennia.metasyntax.net.metasyntax.net (pool-71-188-190-197.aubnin.fios.verizon.net [71.188.190.197]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKpCa-1JMoTS3mJr-0002Wi; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 12:54:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200802050135.m151ZGDH005052@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> (Dan Nicolaescu's message of "Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:35:16 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus 5.13 / Emacs 23.0.60.2 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX191uDuEzCo2svkPE/TMHnR5eJU4wYH1CAU2iWH d/dB442CJgzCXC4FuhND4Pl1rxjostR5sh+KrB8jYOkGfFx3+D ub7Cria4yNoRFQBm777nQ== X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:88348 Archived-At: For what it's worth, I prefer the second one. The lack of a slant (or the backwards slant) in to the "E" in the first one seems unnatural. The shine highlight in the second one looks better with the script in that position as well. -- Taylor Venable http://real.metasyntax.net:2357/ foldr = lambda f, i, l: (len(l) == 1 and [f(l[0], i)] or [f(l[0], foldr(f, i, l[1:]))])[0]