From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: Info-build-node-completions has an extra `*' node Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 01:54:28 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <873arpn89f.fsf@jurta.org> References: <006901c871b3$f4da48d0$2d58908d@us.oracle.com> <006a01c871b5$33b5a260$2d58908d@us.oracle.com> <87tzk7godg.fsf@jurta.org> <87bq6fp2bz.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <874pc7f7ta.fsf@jurta.org> <87ir0nnktt.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203379761 10074 80.91.229.12 (19 Feb 2008 00:09:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:09:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Drew Adams To: Bastien Guerry Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 19 01:09:45 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JRG3H-0001Up-TV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 01:09:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JRG2n-0001Fw-3l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:09:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JRG2i-0001Fk-KU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:09:04 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JRG2h-0001FM-1t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:09:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JRG2g-0001FC-SI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:09:02 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JRG2g-0002IQ-Ks for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:09:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JRG2g-000780-Bs for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:09:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JRG2d-0002Gm-4K for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:09:02 -0500 Original-Received: from relay01.kiev.sovam.com ([62.64.120.200]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JRG2c-0002Fy-Dh for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:08:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [83.170.232.243] (helo=smtp.svitonline.com) by relay01.kiev.sovam.com with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JRG2Z-000K2e-JN; Tue, 19 Feb 2008 02:08:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87ir0nnktt.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien Guerry's message of "Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:56:46 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-Scanner-Signature: 233cb89e4cdd9c68f6fe52a505261b56 X-DrWeb-checked: yes X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: juri@jurta.org X-SpamTest-Group-ID: 00000000 X-SpamTest-Header: Not Detected X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 2252 [Feb 18 2008] X-SpamTest-Info: helo_type=3 X-SpamTest-Info: {HEADERS: header Content-Type found without required header Content-Transfer-Encoding} X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Rate: 11 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0278], KAS30/Release X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 4.8-5.1 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.3) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:89534 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21207 Archived-At: >>> I would prefer the completion to list the possible file names as it >>> lists the possible node names in a normal Info node, without the need >>> to enter a parenthesis first. >> >> This would break the standard format of the node name `(FILE)NODE'. >> >> `g' lists all node names (the virtual Info file `dir' has only one >> node `Top' so it is right for `g' to list only this single node.) >> And according to this format a file name should be inside parenthesis, >> so completion for the file name after parenthesis is more correct. > > What about putting an opening parenthesis in the default list of > completion for the (dir) buffer? For now the opening parenthesis is > like a secret key for those who know that the list of visible items > only reflects files, not real nodes. Why would someone normally want a completion on Info file names instead of Info manual names with typing `m TAB'? -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/