From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.bugs
Subject: Re: bug#141: Process sentinel not called in batch mode
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 23:00:28 -0400
Message-ID: <873aofvvzn.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
References: <87hcd1kcmz.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
	<jwvy76d7yw2.fsf-monnier+emacsbugreports@gnu.org>
	<E1JwyAM-0002Mk-Gm@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<jwv8wya755f.fsf-monnier+emacsbugreports@gnu.org>
	<ur6c2ia52.fsf@gnu.org>
	<jwvr6c25gx1.fsf-monnier+emacsbugreports@gnu.org>
	<uod76hxsc.fsf@gnu.org>
	<jwvabiq5a0d.fsf-monnier+emacsbugreports@gnu.org>
	<umymqhv1r.fsf@gnu.org> <jwv1w40mg1e.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1211166096 25071 80.91.229.12 (19 May 2008 03:01:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 03:01:36 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: 141@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, rms@gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org,
	eller.helmut@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org,
	Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 19 05:02:13 2008
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Jxvdb-0005JL-B4
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 May 2008 05:02:11 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43827 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Jxvcr-0005Ve-Ko
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 May 2008 23:01:25 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Jxvc9-0004zT-RF
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 May 2008 23:00:41 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Jxvc9-0004ym-6t
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 May 2008 23:00:41 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44217 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Jxvc7-0004wW-7Q; Sun, 18 May 2008 23:00:39 -0400
Original-Received: from c-98-216-111-182.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([98.216.111.182]:15713
	helo=furry) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <cyd@stupidchicken.com>)
	id 1Jxvby-0004R0-7W; Sun, 18 May 2008 23:00:30 -0400
Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 2B227C049; Sun, 18 May 2008 23:00:28 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <jwv1w40mg1e.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (Stefan Monnier's message
	of "Sat, 17 May 2008 23:45:48 -0400")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)
X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:97374 gmane.emacs.bugs:18047
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/97374>

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>>> But if we're in wait_reading_process_output, that means that idle or
>>> not, we're checking for process output, so why not check for process
>>> status changes as well?
>
>> Because status_notify has a side effect of triggering redisplay.
>
> Thanks.  Now it makes a lot more sense.  Please add a corresponding
> comment on the do_display check.

What do you think should be the fix for the original problem?