From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: FFI Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 10:22:59 +0200 Message-ID: <8739yt9nks.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> References: <87sk6tonv8.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20100418053925.GA7294@tomas> <878w8lb2s0.fsf_-_@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1271580009 1104 80.91.229.12 (18 Apr 2010 08:40:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 08:40:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, joakim@verona.se, lg@sxemacs.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 18 10:40:05 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O3Q2i-0001AH-LD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 10:39:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34951 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O3Q2f-0007Gu-Ag for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 04:39:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O3Q2D-0006xg-0K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 04:39:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44298 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O3Q2A-0005pB-90 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 04:39:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O3PmU-0000YQ-LS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 04:23:10 -0400 Original-Received: from ka.mail.enyo.de ([87.106.162.201]:43597) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O3PmU-0000YC-6s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 04:23:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [172.17.135.4] (helo=deneb.enyo.de) by ka.mail.enyo.de with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) id 1O3PmN-0002DS-Ux; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 10:22:59 +0200 Original-Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1O3PmN-0002P0-OP; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 10:22:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: <878w8lb2s0.fsf_-_@mail.jurta.org> (Juri Linkov's message of "Sun, 18 Apr 2010 11:09:19 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:123835 Archived-At: * Juri Linkov: > If using its implementation in GNU Emacs is not possible due to legal > reasons, then maybe at least it would be a good idea to implement > FFI in GNU Emacs compatible with SXEmacs. In this case all existing > library bindings will be readily available for GNU Emacs. This is only true if Emacs also implements all SXEmacs types, so it is a bit more ambitious than just implementing the FFI.