From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PATCH: Fix IDO interaction with uniquify.el Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 22:36:51 +0200 Message-ID: <8739y66q70.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <87k4vf1zdh.fsf@telefonica.net> <87tyujz57h.fsf@telefonica.net> <87ockrz4eu.fsf@telefonica.net> <87pr57uw25.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <878w7y6u92.fsf@telefonica.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1273104842 25771 80.91.229.12 (6 May 2010 00:14:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 00:14:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , Chong Yidong , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 06 02:14:00 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O9oiw-0007d8-8K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 May 2010 02:14:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39081 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O9ois-0001UY-Fq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 May 2010 20:13:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O9lL3-0007ql-8G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2010 16:37:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33320 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O9lL1-0007mW-8i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2010 16:37:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O9lKx-0008LN-DA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2010 16:36:56 -0400 Original-Received: from impaqm2.telefonica.net ([213.4.138.2]:20973) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O9lKx-0008LB-4h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2010 16:36:55 -0400 Original-Received: from IMPmailhost3.adm.correo ([10.20.102.124]) by IMPaqm2.telefonica.net with bizsmtp id Dwcd1e0632h2L9m3Mwctev; Wed, 05 May 2010 22:36:53 +0200 Original-Received: from qcore ([83.32.114.29]) by IMPmailhost3.adm.correo with BIZ IMP id Dwcr1e00P0e77Q31jwcslG; Wed, 05 May 2010 22:36:53 +0200 X-TE-authinfo: authemail="981711563$telefonica.net" |auth_email="981711563@telefonica.net" X-TE-AcuTerraCos: auth_cuTerraCos="cosuitnetc01" In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Wed, 5 May 2010 20:59:16 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:124573 Archived-At: Leo writes: > Robustified version. I think we are close to a fix. [snip] This days I'm too busy and have no time for testing your proposed change, but I see that the complexity of your fix is growing to the point that only efficiency possibly remains as its justification. Are we sure we really need that efficiency?