From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Please don't use revision numbers on commit messages (and elsewhere). Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 23:53:14 +0200 Message-ID: <8739m3vtx1.fsf@wanadoo.es> References: <877hbfvwyo.fsf@wanadoo.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301609327 15169 80.91.229.12 (31 Mar 2011 22:08:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:08:47 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 01 00:08:43 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5Q2i-0004FP-JP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 00:08:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59704 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q5PqA-0003Wb-OK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:55:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50915 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q5Po1-0001KI-V0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:53:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5Pnz-0006H9-Pa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:53:28 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:58829) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5Pnz-0006Gf-Ig for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:53:27 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5Pnx-0006Bp-3t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 23:53:25 +0200 Original-Received: from 131.red-83-59-5.dynamicip.rima-tde.net ([83.59.5.131]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 23:53:25 +0200 Original-Received: from ofv by 131.red-83-59-5.dynamicip.rima-tde.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 23:53:25 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 10 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 131.red-83-59-5.dynamicip.rima-tde.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:mrH36j5cm9xrMSBDguwTLZWRcjg= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137955 Archived-At: Lennart Borgman writes: >> So, if you wish to refer to another revision on the commit message (or >> anywhere else) please use the revision id, which is unique for every >> commit. > > Why not both rev number and rev id? If you have the revision id you know the revision number for every branch that contains the revision.