From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daiki Ueno Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: secure plist store Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 03:31:03 +0900 Message-ID: <8739isjxqw.fsf-ueno@unixuser.org> References: <87pqmxvfoh.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87sjrttwh8.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wrh4b9h9.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87aae05l8p.fsf-ueno@unixuser.org> <87k4d4b66p.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wrh0fh4g.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <87y60ncma8.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <87vcvrne02.fsf-ueno@unixuser.org> <87r56ep3sm.fsf@lifelogs.com> <874o39n171.fsf-ueno@unixuser.org> <87mxh0sy9o.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87pqlwkfw1.fsf-ueno@unixuser.org> <87fwmsr9iu.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309378724 23428 80.91.229.12 (29 Jun 2011 20:18:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:18:44 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 29 22:18:41 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qc1Dc-0006ye-79 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:18:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44825 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qc1Da-0000Qj-LK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:18:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:50684) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbzXf-0003vA-3d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:31:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbzXd-0005ea-0y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:31:14 -0400 Original-Received: from ivory4.scn-net.ne.jp ([219.117.176.192]:58088) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbzXc-0005eF-C2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:31:12 -0400 Original-Received: from ([192.168.0.187]) (envelope sender: ) by ivory4.scn-net.ne.jp with Active!Hunter esmtp server; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 03:31:05 +0900 Original-Received: Received: from well-done.deisui.org (g187018.scn-net.ne.jp [202.83.187.18]) (authenticated) by blue17.scn-net.ne.jp (unknown) with ESMTP id p5TIV48C006606 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 03:31:05 +0900 In-Reply-To: <87fwmsr9iu.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:34:49 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Received-From: 219.117.176.192 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:141186 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > I have one suggestion, that `epa-passphrase-callback-function' should > take an extra detail string, as shown in my patch: [...] > Obviously that's not strictly needed since I can write my own function > as you see. epa-passphrase-callback-function is not an API, but an example implementation of passphrase callback. So it is right to redefine it -- you won't need (require 'epa) then. Also, if you use only symmetric encryption, you can remove the condition Y: (if (eq key-id 'SYM) X Y) Regards, -- Daiki Ueno