From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.windows Subject: Re: [h-e-w] bug#10612: GnuTLS bundled with the windows Emacs binaries Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:07:05 -0600 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <8739b26ume.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <84boromyob.fsf@tum.de> <84ipknew07.fsf@tum.de> <87ipjzs512.fsf@gnus.org> <87wr8e8o58.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <87ipjy6z0j.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83zkdaz26s.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327608518 29244 80.91.229.12 (26 Jan 2012 20:08:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 20:08:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-emacs-windows@gnu.org To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 26 21:08:34 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from [140.186.70.17] (helo=lists.gnu.org) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RqVcX-00017y-TG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:08:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34849 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqVcK-0008JA-Sv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:08:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50994 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqVcG-0008Hb-C0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:08:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqVc7-0000lE-R9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:08:10 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:44682) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RqVc7-0000jq-IO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:08:07 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RqVbs-0000ul-Mm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:07:52 +0100 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.133 ([38.98.147.133]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:07:52 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.133 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:07:52 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 49 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.133 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:x4idJYgfbcAeYMY20OQbKsN3NGI= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:147957 gmane.emacs.windows:5230 Archived-At: On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:36:11 +0200 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Ted Zlatanov >> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:32:12 -0600 >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> JB> Christoph's binaries are built against gnutls-3.0.9, but they do not JB> include the GnuTLS DLLs. >> >> Right, and GnuTLS 3.0.9 is not the latest. I meant he should be >> building against the latest GnuTLS, not include it. EZ> You are being unreasonable. 3.0.9 was released just a month ago. A EZ> new GnuTLS release happens every 2 weeks, how can you expect each one EZ> of them be ported to Windows at that pace? Do you think it's just the EZ> "./configure && make" dance we are used to on GNU/Linux? It took me a EZ> full week of uphill battle to do that with 3.0.9, what with all the EZ> prerequisite packages I needed to port first. The previous port EZ> before that was of v2.10, from a year and a half ago. How come it EZ> suddenly is so urgent to have the latest and the greatest? EZ> In any case, feel free to join the battle and help out, instead of EZ> coming up with such unreasonable requirements. My point was not that 3.1.2 is needed right now, but that Christoph should be building against the latest GnuTLS in general. Sorry if that was not clear. I did offer to set up a BuildBot to produce those DLLs, so I don't think I was unreasonable. If the BuildBot can compile them automatically, it should be easy to use the latest. If not... I'll work with you and the GnuTLS developers to make it so. >> I was gonna bring that up next :) What does "semi-official" mean? Can >> I work with Christoph to include the GnuTLS DLLs or not? If not, can we >> add a notice to his binaries announcements to tell users where to find >> prebuilt GnuTLS DLLs? EZ> You (or anyone else) can find the prebuilt Windows binaries of EZ> GnuTLS 3.0.9 here: EZ> http://sourceforge.net/projects/ezwinports/files/ That's not what I asked, though I truly appreciate the work you've done. I mean if I, the user, see that announcement, it would be nice if it told me where to find the GnuTLS DLLs, and even nicer if they came with the binary. Ted