From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Pascal J. Bourguignon" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files? Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:41:44 +0200 Organization: Informatimago Message-ID: <8738v0fxw7.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> References: <87hajhswdh.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1365460920 5033 80.91.229.3 (8 Apr 2013 22:42:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 22:42:00 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 09 00:42:04 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UPKlH-0000VM-Aj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:42:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34905 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPKlH-0004OV-02 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 18:42:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37216) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPKlC-0004OD-MS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 18:42:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPKlB-0002tM-D4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 18:41:58 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:35508) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPKlB-0002rv-6L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 18:41:57 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UPKl7-0000JX-V7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:41:53 +0200 Original-Received: from amontsouris-651-1-102-69.w82-123.abo.wanadoo.fr ([82.123.245.69]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:41:53 +0200 Original-Received: from pjb by amontsouris-651-1-102-69.w82-123.abo.wanadoo.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:41:53 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 37 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: amontsouris-651-1-102-69.w82-123.abo.wanadoo.fr Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAQMAAABtzGvEAAAABlBMVEUAAAD///+l2Z/dAAAA oElEQVR4nK3OsRHCMAwF0O8YQufUNIQRGIAja9CxSA55AxZgFO4coMgYrEDDQZWPIlNAjwq9 033pbOBPtbXuB6PKNBn5gZkhGa86Z4x2wE67O+06WxGD/HCOGR0deY3f9Ijwwt7rNGNf6Oac l/GuZTF1wFGKiYYHKSFAkjIo1b6sCYS1sVmFhhhahKQssRjRT90ITWUk6vvK3RsPGs+M1RuR mV+hO/VvFAAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Accept-Language: fr, es, en User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:MmNiMmVkYzk3MjRlMjJmMDZhODc3NmU0YTFjNjg4MGE3ZDg2MTQxZg== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158788 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> 1. File structuring with outcommented Org-mode headlines (;; * Headline) > > There is already a standard for that: > > ;;; Headline > ;;;; SubHeadline > ;;;;; SubSubHeadline But the lisp convention is the opposite: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ;;;; -*- mode:lisp -*- ;;;; ;;;; File comment ;;;; ;;; ;;; Section comment ;;; (defun code () ;; indented comment (form) ; inline comment (form2) ; long inline comment ;; indented comment (form3)) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- __Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/ A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.