From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files? Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 15:41:58 +0200 Message-ID: <8738uzhlcp.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87hajhswdh.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5csu7ml.fsf@gmail.com> <87hajgu5bp.fsf@gmail.com> <874nfguppw.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87d2u3hmrg.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <51641973.9040603@online.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1365514970 1160 80.91.229.3 (9 Apr 2013 13:42:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 13:42:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=F6hler?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 09 15:42:54 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UPYp3-0003GL-T1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 15:42:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35510 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPYp3-0002pa-Ha for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 09:42:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44367) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPYoM-0001jj-Ii for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 09:42:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPYoF-0005xR-QF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 09:42:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::229]:40956) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPYoF-0005x9-IP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 09:42:03 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id c10so5003404wiw.2 for ; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 06:42:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=swzkMZb5r0BxZ5BpvWPSA7+xGejGq/8Yr5NGS3TEmFY=; b=S22CBc7UVbRZzTMbuRUN3JiNDfVOcENTH9H5w025lTGEmgvva1+McSEqI0t9sUZlmI dGVZgYVLpFXU19rM24qnWLrbkrB3K/qqcmK7Oa9qRRkHHjuS5W7CWT4uhKqci6I60AQv 59gfomoHme7xFYGWBX4uS4U1tZej9K3d6oRaLlgbz+ko90iUKGwVZwLLeOJPFZMs7l1D zhsxN4SzD5gSD+VfL61csU5TQnoTCwcp9uvCUeWQ70wzjoHk8kKDR5FAsWXdRakqWlNz NQLis0AQhoT3hbGq9xmucLbdkw9KfYI/wvG6eoiDZy6YIjcSEubImvjnRFbWJwYMdTEH SzBg== X-Received: by 10.180.76.84 with SMTP id i20mr20112288wiw.9.1365514920115; Tue, 09 Apr 2013 06:42:00 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from bzg.localdomain ([78.250.170.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dm9sm25894968wib.3.2013.04.09.06.41.57 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Apr 2013 06:41:58 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by bzg.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C1F131C2101B; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 15:41:58 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <51641973.9040603@online.de> ("Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=F6hle?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?r=22's?= message of "Tue, 09 Apr 2013 15:36:51 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::229 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158808 Archived-At: Hi Andreas, Andreas Röhler writes: > as this was discussed some weeks ago: That restriction is easy to remove. > If kept, it should not show up last time. You sent the start of a patch for this (untested and uncomplete), it did not really help to convince me that removing this restriction is easy. I know why you can believe this is easy, but I'm not convinced it is -- don't want to discourage you, though. -- Bastien