From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christopher Schmidt Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: using GnuTLS 3.x and certificate checks Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 20:34:15 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <8738ti3gqt@ch.ristopher.com> References: <87zjxumbjf.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87k3ovcn1r.fsf@wanadoo.es> <86fvzj2gkz.fsf@gmail.com> <87sj3jaqfs.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83y5dazmpt.fsf@gnu.org> <86ehf2zefk.fsf@gmail.com> <86li9az2sw.fsf@gmail.com> <83hajyz1mi.fsf@gnu.org> <867gku88lx.fsf@gmail.com> <83a9pqysc5.fsf@gnu.org> <86sj3i6ndd.fsf@gmail.com> <83620eyonh.fsf@gnu.org> <86620dqmsd.fsf@gmail.com> <83r4j1xmim.fsf@gnu.org> <86y5d9p4oh.fsf@gmail.com> <83ppylxidt.fsf@gnu.org> <86txnxoz1k.fsf@gmail.com> <83hajxxd5c.fsf@gnu.org> <874nfxt219.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <874nfenmya@ch.ristopher.com> <877giv7k2s.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1368992067 27420 80.91.229.3 (19 May 2013 19:34:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 19:34:27 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 19 21:34:26 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ue9NC-0000t1-9f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 May 2013 21:34:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43739 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ue9NB-0004qX-26 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 May 2013 15:34:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57077) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ue9N6-0004qR-Op for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 May 2013 15:34:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ue9N4-0005xW-05 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 May 2013 15:34:20 -0400 Original-Received: from ristopher.com ([146.185.21.93]:48601 helo=saturn.ch.ristopher.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ue9N3-0005x9-O2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 May 2013 15:34:17 -0400 Original-Received: by saturn.ch.ristopher.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id 294F6201A3; Sun, 19 May 2013 20:34:15 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ch.ristopher.com; s=mail; t=1368992055; bh=JkZur7DZ0LKRUBYhOnimqfClZi9X2aiPsyXg+UysMd8=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Date; b=DwBohKOUiHiwTLlAoipMYKz307t7quveEGmsbIzwsheGgahohiJK3duN8zYcdjSkC s0VIb91lUhwoZed1F3w4HjMWKUdWQlOyofBK+zxpRmpwE+TmBqbyFDtggAVCLanVFf GTGh/vSDDRpLtY/d09bCA1rkReCvaWL03FVSrhgA= In-Reply-To: <877giv7k2s.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Sat, 18 May 2013 22:57:31 -0400") Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x X-Received-From: 146.185.21.93 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:159676 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > I like your idea, the problem is that often it will be triggered at > very inconvenient times. Emacs, unlike most other environments with > this capability, doesn't deal well with interrupting network I/O to > ask the user questions... not to mention the TCP exchange itself could > be aborted, or the whole thing could be running unattended (--batch > for example). I think a verification mechanism should run unattended without user interaction whatsoever. What's your use case for an interactive verification snippet? Christopher