From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christopher Schmidt Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Mysterious gzipped images Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 14:36:18 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <8738qk9udz@ch.ristopher.com> References: <87mwoul8sz.fsf@igel.home> <87a9ksfh78.fsf@kima.orebokech.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1375968998 9815 80.91.229.3 (8 Aug 2013 13:36:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 13:36:38 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 08 15:36:40 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V7QOM-0005So-He for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 15:36:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33214 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7QOM-0005uj-45 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 09:36:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49160) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7QOC-0005ZP-3t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 09:36:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7QO5-0005L7-Hy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 09:36:28 -0400 Original-Received: from ristopher.com ([146.185.21.93]:45591 helo=saturn.ch.ristopher.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7QO5-0005KP-A7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 09:36:21 -0400 Original-Received: by saturn.ch.ristopher.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id 118FC203E4; Thu, 8 Aug 2013 14:36:18 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ch.ristopher.com; s=mail; t=1375968978; bh=d30DLeWL3CY5a+Wfbi9Z30IcFEAuXV+vB+5vj3Bg/3k=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Date; b=cSJzf4l8R/eqsYNPNbx1x019Bcj0VhjoL42q38g1ks5D7lB4e/jeMsoRgwx2kaNqH 09DsQawhYL9M2Y0Cj2bJ9xxnfCacWwe+Nt2vPZsRkVoFi4kXzYcMcLLBKdiWf20CLu F/zkyJAJdxS7UFndhk7NBGG0KHZ10IAzXj0TJCCc= In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 08 Aug 2013 15:28:46 +0200") Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 146.185.21.93 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:162503 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Well, yes, that will probably be requested, but would require extra > libraries. gzip is "free", since it's already built into 99% of Emacs > builds already. So it smacks of premature overengineering to me. >"? Once the interface found its way into the release, it will not be removed. There is no such thing as overengineering here. Christopher