From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Git version of ELPA Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 13:08:47 +0900 Message-ID: <8738qbk33k.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <8738qs5qrg.fsf@igel.home> <87mwoz4w4f.fsf@igel.home> <877gfrrida.fsf@yandex.ru> <52087DDD.1020100@yandex.ru> <52090C0F.4020508@yandex.ru> <520B4B29.8030201@yandex.ru> <520BB4FA.4080903@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1376539755 1488 80.91.229.3 (15 Aug 2013 04:09:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 04:09:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 15 06:09:13 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V9os5-0002xS-Pd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 06:09:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51145 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V9os5-0007Bs-AQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 00:09:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48523) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V9orv-0007Bk-Km for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 00:09:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V9oro-0002Te-6n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 00:09:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:33809) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V9orn-0002EF-T2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 00:08:56 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mgmt2.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5BC9700A7; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 13:08:48 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C5AAE1A3D92; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 13:08:47 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM undefined under 21.5 (beta32) "habanero" b0d40183ac79 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 130.158.97.224 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:162749 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > > The push just after the removal commit would end up fine. > > No, by definition "push" gives you an exact copy at the other end. By definition in bzr, but not in git. It may be that in the default configuration of recent git-push is restricted to fast-forward, thus producing an identical branch, though.