From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] * lisp/subr.el (string-suffix-p): New function. Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:12:46 +0100 Message-ID: <8738mo4x69.fsf@zigzag.favinet> References: <96EB3F8805134461A3BA58983F643449@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1385111373 26545 80.91.229.3 (22 Nov 2013 09:09:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 09:09:33 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 22 10:09:38 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vjmk1-0005Px-IG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:09:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37600 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vjmk0-0004Wt-Mo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 04:09:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48538) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vjmjs-0004Wh-Kb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 04:09:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vjmjm-0001BU-Ul for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 04:09:24 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp208.alice.it ([82.57.200.104]:25500) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vjmjm-0001B9-K3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 04:09:18 -0500 Original-Received: from zigzag.favinet (95.249.37.10) by smtp208.alice.it (8.6.060.28) id 52443B820E513011 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:09:07 +0100 Original-Received: from ttn by zigzag.favinet with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VjmnH-0005BK-Sz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:12:56 +0100 Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Bozhidar Batsov's message of "Fri, 22 Nov 2013 09:06:10 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 82.57.200.104 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:165545 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable () Bozhidar Batsov () Fri, 22 Nov 2013 09:06:10 +0200 No comments =3D=3D no objections? :-) I think symmetry alone is insufficient motivation. Whether or not that design guideline is appropriate here (for Emacs) is another question. Generally, you can make a better case for inclusion if you find many places in the code base where the function can be used. Another way to improve its prospects is to show new (and cool) code that would not be possible w/o the function. As i see it, no comments =3D=3D no invitation. =2D-=20 Thien-Thi Nguyen GPG key: 4C807502 (if you're human and you know it) read my lisp: (responsep (questions 'technical) (not (via 'mailing-list))) =3D> nil --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlKPIBEACgkQZwMiJEyAdQKO6ACgyF1S2TiVAZyk4o6StyjI7LMF EvoAnAnsaVw6H+d+hmdy/GxrUhbWsW+F =prcn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--