() Bozhidar Batsov <bozhidar@batsov.com>
() Fri, 22 Nov 2013 09:06:10 +0200

   No comments == no objections? :-)

I think symmetry alone is insufficient motivation.  Whether
or not that design guideline is appropriate here (for Emacs)
is another question.

Generally, you can make a better case for inclusion if you
find many places in the code base where the function can be
used.  Another way to improve its prospects is to show new
(and cool) code that would not be possible w/o the function.

As i see it, no comments == no invitation.

-- 
Thien-Thi Nguyen
   GPG key: 4C807502
   (if you're human and you know it)
      read my lisp: (responsep (questions 'technical)
                               (not (via 'mailing-list)))
                     => nil