From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jay Belanger Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: string> missing? Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2015 15:37:54 -0500 Message-ID: <873828ply5.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87oakxkvqw.fsf@petton.fr> <83zj4grgkc.fsf@gnu.org> <87sia8n8b5.fsf@petton.fr> <87zj4gu821.fsf@gnu.org> <83sia8rdkm.fsf@gnu.org> <83pp5crbfd.fsf@gnu.org> <83mw0gr4eh.fsf@gnu.org> <83h9qor2kk.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: jay.p.belanger@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1433363933 5480 80.91.229.3 (3 Jun 2015 20:38:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 20:38:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jay.p.belanger@gmail.com To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 03 22:38:44 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0FQx-0000SR-6U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 22:38:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37929 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0FQw-0001Kt-GU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 16:38:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50677) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0FQQ-0000fL-D9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 16:38:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0FQM-000393-ON for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 16:38:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-oi0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::231]:35127) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0FQM-00038Z-Fy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 16:38:06 -0400 Original-Received: by oihd6 with SMTP id d6so16675331oih.2 for ; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 13:38:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:references:reply-to:cc:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=3aDUkGvo3cknL0oPTCCfQGvm2F2K9RtbJol5DidT0DU=; b=aiwUVdkxwf14Y938wrWvXN5wBuFVXVA197jZtfWy36JbW92lf2hGIoQ54fIdQJDvHK BsVsy7AWdolwDRq7IZ8pVNP6k0U3Y/DevXre0tFHPowPsC6xdaaAgyOL31LicBtWuCjP ZDmJ0x4GUzMZzJUn8XPn62GQMQPl2WKMV9s6D6xq85/fMw7Fz9Xtwct0fQV4BKkPICK6 jqR6IElLWEJ3KGc91dW5VJYcfsDHZjORJ8A6BF35z+9dOTXUK0Y8UDiAoNeU7pGhox0o qoJmNFDBcBWZU58gNceKLQReF5LP8CZrpCqmGTMBytZZhIKY3Qs51hoTSWwNAf+dUib3 aGqg== X-Received: by 10.202.220.135 with SMTP id t129mr19602868oig.115.1433363885572; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 13:38:05 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from belanger-home (67-60-106-71.cpe.cableone.net. [67.60.106.71]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id xp8sm12122384obc.10.2015.06.03.13.38.04 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Jun 2015 13:38:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Nick Andryshak's message of "Wed, 03 Jun 2015 16:11:11 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c06::231 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:187001 Archived-At: Nick Andryshak writes: >> Because they do. The cause is lost in history. > >> No, I don't agree. > >> That's exactly the point: there's no need to apply the same logic to >> both cases. > > Those are entirely unreasonable answers. In what way is any one of the answers the least bit unreasonable?