From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Yoni Rabkin Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New maintainer Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 17:18:13 -0400 Message-ID: <8737xuuw2y.fsf@rabkins.net> References: <560CCEBA.9080607@online.de> <874miapdhs.fsf@openmailbox.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443734330 30665 80.91.229.3 (1 Oct 2015 21:18:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 21:18:50 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 01 23:18:34 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhlFK-0001rA-32 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 23:18:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56289 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhlFJ-0001yS-Hv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 17:18:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55364) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhlF7-0001xF-Nt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 17:18:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhlF4-0005pP-Jp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 17:18:21 -0400 Original-Received: from smtprelay0189.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.189]:36670 helo=smtprelay.hostedemail.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhlF4-0005pJ-GQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 17:18:18 -0400 Original-Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (unknown [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58BF09ED95 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 21:18:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Session-Marker: 796F6E69407261626B696E732E6E6574 X-HE-Tag: badge55_2b3544e29df1e X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1318 Original-Received: from yrk-ThinkPad-T410.rabkins.net (c-50-189-99-60.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [50.189.99.60]) (Authenticated sender: yoni@rabkins.net) by omf02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 21:18:16 +0000 (UTC) X-Ethics: Use GNU In-Reply-To: (John Wiegley's message of "Thu, 01 Oct 2015 13:46:10 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 216.40.44.189 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190603 Archived-At: > However: are you looking for someone to act as an arm of the FSF, or > do you want the best possible Emacs? You've manufactured that distinction artificially in order to make people think that the two are mutually exclusive. Please don't do that. How can it be the best possible GNU/Emacs if it doesn't respect my freedom? -- "Cut your own wood and it will warm you twice"