From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dynamic loading progress Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2015 15:38:08 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <8737wgw7kf.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <871tc315y3.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83611eqk9w.fsf@gnu.org> <878u6ax7c7.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83k2ptq5t3.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9kxx60e.fsf@lifelogs.com> <877flswse5.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447015129 16407 80.91.229.3 (8 Nov 2015 20:38:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 20:38:49 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 08 21:38:39 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvWjX-0006DD-8Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 21:38:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48761 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvWjW-00038K-H2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 15:38:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33367) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvWjH-00038E-7E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 15:38:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvWjC-0002jn-8D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 15:38:23 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:48551) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvWjC-0002jg-1X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 15:38:18 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvWj9-0005rL-W5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 21:38:16 +0100 Original-Received: from 98.229.60.157 ([98.229.60.157]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 21:38:15 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by 98.229.60.157 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 21:38:15 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 22 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 98.229.60.157 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:DYONwE/VIZvTdhmDkoP3yNYXluA= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193654 Archived-At: On Sun, 08 Nov 2015 13:42:21 +0000 Philipp Stephani wrote: PS> Ted Zlatanov schrieb am So., 8. Nov. 2015 um 14:08 Uhr: >> Agreed. Aurélien, the diff is huge and there are many conflicts. It >> looks like the fork from master happened in February 2015 and you're >> simply out of date. Can you please rebase against the emacs.git >> origin/master? Last push... PS> Please check PS> https://github.com/phst/emacs-dynamic-module/tree/dynamic-modules-2, it PS> should have the current master merged in. PS> Unfortunately I can't test that right now because for some reason make is PS> incredibly slow on my machine after the merge. Sorry, Philipp, I don't know how you and Aurélien have collaborated in the past, and I've considered Aurélien's code authoritative. I don't want to bypass his review and approval, so maybe you can work with him on that? It will save us time instead of reviewing several times. Thank you! Ted