From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Petton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New update of the Emacs homepage online Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 13:00:42 +0100 Message-ID: <8737sq9qj9.fsf@petton.fr> References: <87twl8srkg.fsf@petton.fr> <87ziuycz6f.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455796870 31225 80.91.229.3 (18 Feb 2016 12:01:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 12:01:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: Bastien Guerry Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 18 13:00:59 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aWNGU-0002mG-8j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 13:00:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40411 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWNGT-0004xH-HY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:00:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46766) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWNGO-0004u2-AM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:00:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWNGK-00036S-AW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:00:52 -0500 Original-Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:49008) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWNGK-00035m-7Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:00:48 -0500 Original-Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F66820836 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:00:45 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:00:45 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=NiWVape/lDdJVnD+5ekTyxOlGOU=; b=Q0zLI deXfKfFq5rengh8mJctJvH4+ZJddF66VtIF8wxV7YnjKnZ/Si5CULmR9oJJbvS17 4N2o8unWLzmu/R3M7mRnLTTvGvrNRW5nxrv1+jqkUwn8VxXkFdwUExfQB3uY7BUN /CkjuD2KNW+XMc6J0CBuZTq0rcIqPqROAFKKEs= X-Sasl-enc: SbP4uXqsjUbuNRejiMuBkGd0LuSH5+SV21q2eZsbxfS4 1455796845 Original-Received: from blueberry (lfbn-1-7726-61.w92-167.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.167.139.61]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C0C8A680183; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:00:44 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87ziuycz6f.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.1.50.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 66.111.4.27 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:200121 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Bastien Guerry writes: > great job, this looks really neat! Thanks Bastien! > Aesthetically (so you can safely ignore this): it feels like the page > mixes two distinct color schemes, one yellow-purple, another red-gray. > IIRC, the second one comes from early versions of your page, the first > one is more recent. I'm not sure the two mixes 100% fine for my eyes, > especially purple-red. Maybe the bottom should simply be "purplish"? I understand what you mean. This section will evolve anyway, but I will try to change the color. > Anyway, just a minor quirk, the overall impression is that "Emacs is > the future". :) I'm glad you see it this way, that's really what I've been trying to achieve :) Nico --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWxbJqAAoJECM1h6R8IHkQWckIANW7GK/dIZopuUuGXqF1Qacc zKaEuE5rJ2fSh0kF3OzI34unxIMx64w4QAstIQ/jUbojaUGKxNTDOZIZhWgeTiZP VwdoBLPKGGcGTCyl5ea9i8M8aSrSZq8xk805CBLo+PkjzalXLwndWNd2Tzp6C45q p5WRK1nfhu+srcmXdTGiUBeN2tLM+YpE1qqZ833+opA/fEjS+jCRluDK19PyxjFR 3XOWNz8ljZGwUayvI/5Jmc4KdrXcVhJpPJZQbgWT9lsygEfmJtW8dCZdDV8kAih8 dU4qvlm/nG3D2N1rkBOklJbeCG4DSmgxxy9cd6s4BWT4bRxEsZJ9tJudUNC+VI0= =puQh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--