From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Managing environments (Python venv, guix environment, etc.) Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 12:45:14 +0200 Message-ID: <8737mwznid.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87y453sy0n.fsf@earth.catern.com> <87r3arripr.fsf@earth.catern.com> <874m7jygot.fsf@earth.catern.com> <83oa5ox21u.fsf@gnu.org> <123d2ae9-b523-5d5b-3bf8-c6e4462270b8@yandex.ru> <83vazvt8q3.fsf@gnu.org> <83oa5ltzy0.fsf@gnu.org> <6626aaa2-caa5-48cb-2898-931c4eae4e5c@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1469530029 1465 80.91.229.3 (26 Jul 2016 10:47:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 10:47:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 26 12:46:55 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bRzt0-0003s6-DP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 12:46:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38778 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRzsz-0003nP-Qb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 06:46:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38994) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRzrd-0002yJ-Lq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 06:45:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRzrX-0007GP-Al for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 06:45:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:65144) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRzrW-0007GK-WB; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 06:45:23 -0400 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([87.146.54.210]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MVe87-1boGtG17QV-00Yz8d; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 12:45:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 25 Jul 2016 23:06:38 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:0ljwY41NF6jfTr1ScKm6H1yF1zHKS04rynwGvdfxa3PYzy1+/rm +/eGusT7zDTPBZwz/B6ui00NOHdBJNzyhKwQiom3KO6WNSimGgwunANIlANmgA97Ql88qgu C8YDfugjtglz5+VKZk5DmROZ+oDrp4hKQ4jmJrzbyeuYBupInSoO/ijEt49ReRvTx+qmFqL LYsi8SGaupQKnxbAcI4Eg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:ruLndA6muAM=:dckxo+zIOmHnuR+swRQUA1 4PbaoR5qP/mbKwlo0bZUWhPlQqKgVSBN8AwEtXnlWOLgw80R+Usf3xo+VDsTQ444KMVaE+4eT DUL3qrNp8f5NJ0/W0MtkTFx+1SQUr4VHwjEmxZdRYnJICw1pSZdXyjMWiUaeMzV0V0oWmXPEw iPkLYFtrV8/VLFI/dxvCK81XDcVp319v9X4u3sOUa7yZ861ENMk8Bvtmy93C0AxD1Vkd/+RYg Q85TO03kjhI/fbvhyYRck3+/j2hHrWrhe8r6vD2TPiT8svamaT7lG8DXuykc51qfCExnTD/r0 26nFe5Rp4r3au/zjGLXb9gz89greFOtCiXmQeKYkKuXSDwv82RTnyqwzrEJCeeDkEvG7dz5Ch 4pt7u1i9PpkQhP++pciP8OrdCzu0hd7GHJoQxTw8Wk1iunUpgBhVgdre9c3rmOW7vOQiq/Py5 Zf6YP0QBSqUPnGSJaiXza1XMd3c1qgq11Ol7mrvUiFtJ/1iWWBJzJTGHoGKsA64jGZ2KbdWmp R6EaTfzZBNVr4ntLGSnEas2HRy8q5n1SrMo+G1waR3cNLaekGIOusHHla2Am9Li6+GzIqBmz1 6XOHS9M5GDh4N3yV+CXDcxbpSFs9gEfkWlAgNXVNnC5+pGN9OChqfPzxjPWupJniYAJSmQbyX T+0ILSHpqNZXZcRKupuYcfPZTVFQ3LOmihNq/t0Ewn6jXx6Trc+DV2ZbBdmEcujOD3FGkMWwE SfPxLslmyo2CV898t2tjeSvgquqZUHB4yICyAaa/VFzrF3ORAlBPfLh+rO3dMSzVJpmuMGxh X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.18 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:206142 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> Maybe default handler implementation could bind the handlers alist to nil >> and call file-truename again. > > And actually that's exactly how file-name-handlers are expected to > behave in general. Not really. They bind inhibit-file-name-handlers and inhibit-file-name-operation. > Stefan Best regards, Michael.