From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: official Emacs Docker image Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 12:44:00 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <8737g0qw7z.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87mvukq7gd.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <877fcyg5ah.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87h9c0b6bd.fsf@lifelogs.com> <878txa9zvx.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87k29gsgam.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87k29cmq1u.fsf@elephly.net> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1485798292 9974 195.159.176.226 (30 Jan 2017 17:44:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 17:44:52 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 30 18:44:48 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cYG0V-0002Os-7b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 18:44:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34199 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYG0X-0000h0-LT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 12:44:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43899) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYFzz-0000gk-GH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 12:44:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYFzw-0001NE-BC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 12:44:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=44912 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYFzw-0001M5-4Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 12:44:12 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cYFzm-0000uT-FC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 18:44:02 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 36 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:d2v2rre1iDHiHw8BYDsKa3m8EIc= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:211773 Archived-At: On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 18:10:53 +0100 Ricardo Wurmus wrote: RW> Filipe Silva writes: >> Ted, I think that before the portable dumper branch get's merged or the big >> elc file branch gets merged, you are going to have a really hard time >> writing a docker file for that because of: >> https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/22801 RW> I would like to state again that we (i.e. the GNU project) already have RW> a way to build valid Docker images for Emacs using GNU Guix. It does RW> not even involve the use of Docker, nor does it require a third-party RW> “base image” of a GNU+Linux system. I don't see a problem providing both as "gnuemacs/guix-emacs" and "gnuemacs/docker-emacs" or something like that. Or as tags of "gnuemacs/emacs". I don't think they are equivalent, though, so the need for a `docker build' solution is still there. RW> Would it be helpful if the Guix project provided a Docker image for the RW> latest release for download? To me it seems only natural for GNU Emacs RW> and GNU Guix to cooperate; it’s all GNU. Sure. But there's more that Docker Hub offers: a global namespace; a distributed download service; automated builds. You can upload the Guix image to Docker Hub and get all of those benefits except the automated builds: see https://docs.docker.com/docker-hub/repos/ If you can pack an ARM build into the image so it's multiarch, that's great too. I know there's a way to do it with the Docker tools, so the image format supports it. But it's definitely not a requirement. I can add you to the Docker Hub account so you can do at least the first uploads. Later we can automate them through Hydra or some other CI tool. Ted