From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Proposals for fixing package-initialize Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 15:55:33 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87377phx6y.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1505418960 22409 195.159.176.226 (14 Sep 2017 19:56:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 19:56:00 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 14 21:55:54 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dsaEs-0005dN-6S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 21:55:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49793 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsaEz-0001H4-Gx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 15:56:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43359) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsaEm-0001Fe-Es for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 15:55:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsaEh-0002QL-6g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 15:55:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=57285 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dsaEg-0002PI-Vk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 15:55:43 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dsaEV-00057o-6C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 21:55:31 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:hyYlaFet+v9r3GB82G2x2kHHILs= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:218295 Archived-At: On Sun, 3 Sep 2017 22:31:57 -0700 Radon Rosborough wrote: RR> You may have seen slightly over 150 emails fly by in the last few RR> weeks talking about package-initialize. Hilariously, we still haven't RR> managed to reach a conclusion. RR> This email is an attempt to present all the proposals that have been RR> discussed, in an even-handed way, so that we can make a decision RR> without everyone needing to have read the aforementioned 150 emails. Thank you! FWIW I'm in favor of Proposal F: Use more declarative configuration Ted