From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "If you're still seeing problems, please reopen." [Was: bug#25148:] Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 18:58:25 +0100 Message-ID: <8736emz8ou.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <20191117113054.49837.qmail@mail.muc.de> <87pnhq7mxg.fsf@gnus.org> <87bltaz9g4.fsf@telefonica.net> <877e3y5r6x.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="162401"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 17 18:59:10 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iWOpJ-000g1R-8B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 18:59:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55318 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iWOpH-0003XT-Ml for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 12:59:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43067) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iWOop-0003Wj-Px for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 12:58:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iWOon-0003cE-QU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 12:58:39 -0500 Original-Received: from 195-159-176-226.customer.powertech.no ([195.159.176.226]:43444 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iWOon-0003Wj-Ie for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 12:58:37 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iWOom-000fLn-7K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 18:58:36 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:H0O6Z3M+OT5a0cmeikl00Og32lQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:242290 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Óscar Fuentes writes: > >> IMO this is not satisfactory. The message says "do this", but there >> is no clue about how to do "this". >> >> Debbugs is the most user-hostile bug tracking system that I deal with. > > All the user has to do is hit the "reply" button in the mail reader > they're using. How is that user-hostile? The message says "reopen", not "reply". And how is it acceptable to depend on the willingness and availability of somebody else to effectively reopen the bug?