From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Simen_Heggest=C3=B8yl?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-27 03080b5: Remove extraneous closing paren Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 12:25:09 +0100 Message-ID: <8735zfk4mi.fsf@runbox.com> References: <20210104170418.482.54238@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210104170420.3113A20CB7@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26599"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 05 12:28:33 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kwkVs-0006nu-6Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 12:28:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43004 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwkVr-0005aU-7n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 06:28:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38650) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwkTB-0004K5-Fc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 06:25:45 -0500 Original-Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:55186) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kwkSy-00007c-BW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 06:25:44 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=runbox.com; s=selector2; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=syOYYUgvyyRNJQZ8wCNg+Fe/LcH198Z8JgGcPtfipb0=; b=KM20fgxCBjgTfsUdUNzwFuE/AK jhrcFA11j+9SVjx4n6o9xx9ll5Mli9aLZuoieaC8IOEnUNmltola/s4MVy+067zkgYUyyRc2bb0Pc fo0Rb4N5owCRvxwwRMmASyXgPP8uD+vOedL/9MQII1lL7HKJK7JptLYqrc3ikaiwvXUpjeCLqAOW3 6swFpI7e46/XlDb22iB2SAukOT6E8aW/r0iIGE9+eTfynRUQiWo1ZLgCjuoEL3aW5HzpnWRfkZE/t RKb/4V0Drq4mTmGUxtBgAP3oGsxw5MBwIM0gtiLF5h3durXWImAQy/YqsQwVANLeZ5e7iT9+CPqyg AisL7xOg==; Original-Received: from [10.9.9.72] (helo=submission01.runbox) by mailtransmit03.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kwkSu-0003mO-Us; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 12:25:29 +0100 Original-Received: by submission01.runbox with esmtpsa [Authenticated alias (963757)] (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) id 1kwkSb-0007Rc-Q2; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 12:25:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 04 Jan 2021 13:13:12 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=91.220.196.211; envelope-from=simenheg@runbox.com; helo=aibo.runbox.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:262514 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> diff --git a/doc/lispref/modes.texi b/doc/lispref/modes.texi >> index 27ca544..7274086 100644 >> --- a/doc/lispref/modes.texi >> +++ b/doc/lispref/modes.texi >> @@ -4165,7 +4165,7 @@ Here is an example of an indentation function: >> (`(,_ . ",") (smie-rule-separator kind)) >> (`(:after . ":=") sample-indent-basic) >> (`(:before . ,(or `"begin" `"(" `"@{"))) >> - (if (smie-rule-hanging-p) (smie-rule-parent))) >> + (if (smie-rule-hanging-p) (smie-rule-parent)) >> (`(:before . "if") >> (and (not (smie-rule-bolp)) (smie-rule-prev-p "else") >> (smie-rule-parent))))) > > Really? No, it was supposed to be removed from the line before. Sorry about that. Should be fixed now! -- Simen