From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jonas Bernoulli Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A different way to interactively pass options to commands Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 20:06:33 +0100 Message-ID: <8735xma9ja.fsf@bernoul.li> References: <878s7m1mo3.fsf@gnus.org> <87ft1u9xhh.fsf@telefonica.net> <87o8giz61u.fsf@gnus.org> <87blchzo9b.fsf@gnus.org> <875z2pu0as.fsf@gmail.com> <87o8ggcba0.fsf@bernoul.li> <614a0552-e851-37c6-e6e5-8019c08451a7@posteo.de> <87ft1p9cpg.fsf@bernoul.li> <8635xn6kuw.fsf@stephe-leake.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23696"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes , Doug Davis , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Clemens , =?utf-8?Q?K?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9vin?= Le Gouguec , Lars Ingebrigtsen , Stefan Monnier To: Stephen Leake Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 23 20:09:40 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lEd40-000621-41 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 20:09:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50676 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEd3z-0000rr-17 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:09:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47522) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEd19-0000Bc-If for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:06:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([212.243.197.30]:48178) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEd16-00008o-ME for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:06:43 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B33160DD; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 20:06:35 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bernoul.li; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:message-id:date:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:subject:from:from:received :received; s=sel2011a; t=1614107193; bh=d7GEd/z89e9aOoZDrVH67qvQ zFZd/oCchJk72g27Pq0=; b=cTB8G0Z8Cak29NFFkdoIOc3TAduoPV+ANKyjHRSS 3+FavcneAL3OE95e+etkF/aEhRulhaXwW2s45HGwUeGM/alXEFOHjgORJHNExihn MfbxnvAnRQKTliM770OVhlorbZJFas1LWS164xMeEBw2hBFtJD7JWwfOo2mCIk6Y vPs= X-Virus-Scanned: by Hostpark/NetZone Mailprotection at hostpark.net Original-Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail1.hostpark.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id 6e9qcs17xzT6; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 20:06:33 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8C0D160C9; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 20:06:33 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <8635xn6kuw.fsf@stephe-leake.org> Received-SPF: none client-ip=212.243.197.30; envelope-from=jonas@bernoul.li; helo=mail.hostpark.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:265549 Archived-At: Stephen Leake writes: > Jonas Bernoulli writes: > >>> What are your thoughts about the discussion of including it in Emacs? >>> I think having it built-in would be a huge benefit. >> >> I would prefer the "bundled elpa package" approach over adding the >> package to emacs.git itself, but don't know if that feature is already >> usable. > > Since transient is a single elisp file, the simplest approach is to put > it in emacs.git under lisp, and enter it in elpa as a :core package. > Then emacs.git is the upstream development repo. Plus transient.texi. Does that change anything? > The proposed policy for bundled elpa packages is that core emacs code > may not depend on them; on the other hand, core emacs code may depend on > :core elpa packages. Well that decides it then; core it is.